Skip to main content
All benchmarks

Dental Website SEO Benchmark: Pennsylvania (2026)

Based on 1,648 audited dental websites in Pennsylvania, from 2,430 attempted domains. Cohort dps-37-v1.

Browse the Pennsylvania practice directory

Pennsylvania practices scored a median of 75, 2 points below the national median of 77. The largest difference versus the national cohort (n=50,405) was clear booking action not detected: 48.79% of 1,648 Pennsylvania sites, 6.44 percentage points higher than the national rate. Pennsylvania's strongest other relative result was unclear H1 structure, with the observed gap 0.52 percentage points below the national rate.

75

Median score

−2.00 vs national median 77

72.39

Mean score

−1.74 vs national mean 74.13

1,648

Websites checked

Nationwide: 50,405 websites checked

67.82%

Auditable rate

−2.85 pp vs national 70.67% (50,405 of 71,323); state base 1,648 of 2,430

Score distribution

Grade distribution

Percentages use all 1,648 audited Pennsylvania domains as the base.

A

3.88%

64 of 1,648

B

31.07%

512 of 1,648

C

30.16%

497 of 1,648

D

18.20%

300 of 1,648

F

16.69%

275 of 1,648

Category detail

Average category scores

Each average uses the same 1,648-domain audited base. Local SEO is shown only as a labelled detail because three inputs were not evaluated in this cohort.

59.80

Website fundamentals

Average across 1,648 websites

66.46

AI visibility

Average across 1,648 websites

66.53

Patient trust

Average across 1,648 websites

96.41

Local SEO

Partial; upward-biased

Largest absolute difference first

Metric rates versus the national cohort

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in this bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage below shows its observation base.

Pennsylvania metric rates compared with national rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
MetricPennsylvania rateNational rateDifference vs national
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey48.79%804 of 1,64842.35%50,405 websites+6.44 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey64.44%1,062 of 1,64858.40%50,405 websites+6.04 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data44.54%734 of 1,64838.72%50,405 websites+5.82 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data69.36%1,143 of 1,64863.60%50,405 websites+5.76 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey55.76%919 of 1,64851.40%50,405 websites+4.36 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals77.06%1,270 of 1,64874.25%50,405 websites+2.81 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals34.83%574 of 1,64832.11%50,405 websites+2.72 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey44.72%737 of 1,64842.09%50,405 websites+2.63 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals27.91%460 of 1,64826.14%50,405 websites+1.77 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey70.27%1,158 of 1,64868.70%50,405 websites+1.57 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data93.45%1,540 of 1,64891.90%50,405 websites+1.55 pp
DNS failureCrawl accessibility12.22%297 of 2,43010.68%71,323 websites+1.54 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey66.99%1,104 of 1,64865.47%50,405 websites+1.52 pp
HTTP 403 responseCrawl accessibility9.30%226 of 2,4308.09%71,323 websites+1.21 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data96.60%1,592 of 1,64895.57%50,405 websites+1.03 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals25.67%423 of 1,64824.75%50,405 websites+0.92 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals33.92%559 of 1,64833.36%50,405 websites+0.56 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals53.28%878 of 1,64853.80%50,405 websites−0.52 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data91.50%1,508 of 1,64891.06%50,405 websites+0.44 pp
robots.txt restrictionCrawl accessibility4.24%103 of 2,4303.82%71,323 websites+0.42 pp
TimeoutCrawl accessibility0.25%6 of 2,4300.40%71,323 websites−0.15 pp
Other crawl failureCrawl accessibility4.16%101 of 2,4304.22%71,323 websites−0.06 pp
Invalid responseCrawl accessibility0.33%8 of 2,4300.38%71,323 websites−0.05 pp
Other HTTP errorCrawl accessibility1.69%41 of 2,4301.73%71,323 websites−0.04 pp

Largest audited city-state samples

Top Pennsylvania markets in the cohort

Markets are ordered by audited-domain count. Each row gives its own base; these are descriptive cohort cuts, not city rankings.

Top ten Pennsylvania city-state markets by audited-domain count
MarketAudited domainsMedian score
Philadelphia, PA14674
Pittsburgh, PA9873.50
Allentown, PA3577
Lancaster, PA3174
Erie, PA2678
York, PA2580
West Chester, PA2278.50
Doylestown, PA2179
Harrisburg, PA2077.50
Bethlehem, PA1679.50

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Pennsylvania

How do Pennsylvania dental practice websites score?
Across 1,648 audited Pennsylvania dental websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 75 out of 100 — 2 points below the national median of 77. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks.
What do Pennsylvania dental websites most often get wrong?
The most widespread gaps observed in the Pennsylvania cohort are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (97% of audited sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (93% of audited sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (92% of audited sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How can I compare my dental practice website with the Pennsylvania average?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

What this study measures—and what it does not

Cohort. The completed production run covered 109,408 matched practice-location candidates across 71,323 normalized domains. Website-level findings use one deterministic representative candidate for each of the 50,405 successfully crawled domains, avoiding duplicate-domain weighting.

Collection window. Public pages were crawled on 2–3 August 2026 using methodology dps-37-v1. The bounded HTTP crawler inspected robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages. Browser rendering was not used for this index run.

Scoring. The DentalPresence Score averages four deterministic category scores. Three Local SEO inputs—Google Business Profile, cross-directory NAP consistency, and service coverage—were not evaluated in this open-data backfill, so the Local SEO average is partial and upward-biased.

Detection limits. A signal not detected in three pages may exist elsewhere, be injected only after JavaScript rendering, or use markup the parser did not recognize. The high “orphan page” result was excluded from headline recommendations because a bounded crawl cannot establish sitewide orphan status reliably.

Sampling. This is a large matched open-place cohort, not a probability sample of every U.S. dental office. It should not be used to estimate national market share or infer the quality of any individual practice.

No causal claims. The study did not use rankings, traffic, conversions, clinical data, credentials, safety records, or patient outcomes. A failed check is an observable website signal, not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The state benchmark describes a cohort, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice.