Skip to main content
Pennsylvania benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Harrisburg, PA

Live figures from 36 indexable audited Harrisburg dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

72.50

median score

+0.50 vs Pennsylvania median 72

69.86

average score

Pennsylvania average: 69.29

82

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

36

websites audited

of 3,090 across Pennsylvania

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Harrisburg

Counts use all 36 indexable audited Harrisburg websites.

A

0.00%

0 of 36

B

30.56%

11 of 36

C

30.56%

11 of 36

D

16.67%

6 of 36

F

22.22%

8 of 36

Pennsylvania distribution: A 3% · B 25% · C 30% · D 18% · F 25% (3,090 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Harrisburg dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Harrisburg websites are omitted.

94%

FAQPage structured data not detected

34 of 36 evaluated Harrisburg websites — vs 96.44% across Pennsylvania.

94%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

34 of 36 evaluated Harrisburg websites — vs 93.30% across Pennsylvania.

94%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

34 of 36 evaluated Harrisburg websites — vs 94.50% across Pennsylvania.

Harrisburg check rates compared with Pennsylvania rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckHarrisburg ratePennsylvania rateDifference
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey38.89%14 of 36 evaluated61.46%1,899 of 3,090 evaluated−22.57 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data63.89%23 of 36 evaluated73.27%2,264 of 3,090 evaluated−9.38 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey41.67%15 of 36 evaluated50.74%1,568 of 3,090 evaluated−9.07 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey47.22%17 of 36 evaluated55.53%1,716 of 3,090 evaluated−8.31 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey77.78%28 of 36 evaluated69.77%2,156 of 3,090 evaluated+8.01 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals50.00%18 of 36 evaluated42.01%1,298 of 3,090 evaluated+7.99 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals61.11%22 of 36 evaluated69.06%2,134 of 3,090 evaluated−7.95 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals41.67%15 of 36 evaluated36.54%1,129 of 3,090 evaluated+5.13 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals38.89%14 of 36 evaluated33.92%1,048 of 3,090 evaluated+4.97 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey77.78%28 of 36 evaluated72.88%2,252 of 3,090 evaluated+4.90 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals61.11%22 of 36 evaluated57.73%1,784 of 3,090 evaluated+3.38 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals38.89%14 of 36 evaluated42.20%1,304 of 3,090 evaluated−3.31 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey66.67%24 of 36 evaluated69.68%2,153 of 3,090 evaluated−3.01 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data55.56%20 of 36 evaluated53.04%1,639 of 3,090 evaluated+2.52 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data94.44%34 of 36 evaluated96.44%2,980 of 3,090 evaluated−2.00 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data94.44%34 of 36 evaluated93.30%2,883 of 3,090 evaluated+1.14 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data94.44%34 of 36 evaluated94.50%2,920 of 3,090 evaluated−0.06 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Harrisburg

How good are dental practice websites in Harrisburg?
Across 36 audited Harrisburg dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 72.50 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 82 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Harrisburg dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Harrisburg dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (94% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (94% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (94% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Harrisburg compare with the rest of Pennsylvania?
Harrisburg's median score of 72.50 is 0.5 points above the Pennsylvania-wide median of 72, based on 3,090 audited websites across Pennsylvania.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Harrisburg in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Pennsylvania benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Harrisburg figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.