Skip to main content
Wales benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Cardiff, WLS

Live figures from 64 indexable audited Cardiff dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 1, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

71

median score

+1.50 vs Wales median 69.50

67.83

average score

Wales average: 66.62

78.25

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

64

websites audited

of 318 across Wales

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Cardiff

Counts use all 64 indexable audited Cardiff websites.

A

4.69%

3 of 64

B

18.75%

12 of 64

C

29.69%

19 of 64

D

20.31%

13 of 64

F

26.56%

17 of 64

Wales distribution: A 1% · B 14% · C 34% · D 22% · F 28% (318 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Cardiff dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Cardiff websites are omitted.

100%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

64 of 64 evaluated Cardiff websites — vs 96.86% across Wales.

100%

FAQPage structured data not detected

64 of 64 evaluated Cardiff websites — vs 98.11% across Wales.

92%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

59 of 64 evaluated Cardiff websites — vs 95.91% across Wales.

Cardiff check rates compared with Wales rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckCardiff rateWales rateDifference
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals71.88%46 of 64 evaluated63.52%202 of 318 evaluated+8.36 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals35.94%23 of 64 evaluated41.82%133 of 318 evaluated−5.88 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals51.56%33 of 64 evaluated56.60%180 of 318 evaluated−5.04 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals65.63%42 of 64 evaluated61.32%195 of 318 evaluated+4.31 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data53.13%34 of 64 evaluated57.23%182 of 318 evaluated−4.10 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey65.63%42 of 64 evaluated69.50%221 of 318 evaluated−3.87 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data92.19%59 of 64 evaluated95.91%305 of 318 evaluated−3.72 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data100.00%64 of 64 evaluated96.86%308 of 318 evaluated+3.14 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data70.31%45 of 64 evaluated73.27%233 of 318 evaluated−2.96 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals46.88%30 of 64 evaluated49.06%156 of 318 evaluated−2.18 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data100.00%64 of 64 evaluated98.11%312 of 318 evaluated+1.89 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey85.94%55 of 64 evaluated87.74%279 of 318 evaluated−1.80 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey70.31%45 of 64 evaluated71.38%227 of 318 evaluated−1.07 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals34.38%22 of 64 evaluated35.22%112 of 318 evaluated−0.84 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey65.63%42 of 64 evaluated66.04%210 of 318 evaluated−0.41 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey89.06%57 of 64 evaluated88.68%282 of 318 evaluated+0.38 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey43.75%28 of 64 evaluated43.71%139 of 318 evaluated+0.04 pp

2026 UK study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 8,627-website 2026 UK study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Clear booking action not detected57.91%

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected52.32%

Limited useful content40.51%

Emergency-services page not detected67.06%

Privacy-policy link not detected37.54%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected65.42%

Contact or inquiry form not detected58.49%

XML sitemap not detected32.75%

Missing meta descriptions50.77%

Missing canonical tags41.14%

Unclear H1 structure61.85%

Images missing alternative text64.46%

FAQ page not detected80.31%

AggregateRating structured data not detected88.90%

Insurance or payment page not detected83.30%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.12%

FAQPage structured data not detected91.00%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Cardiff

How good are dental practice websites in Cardiff?
Across 64 audited Cardiff dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 71 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 78.25 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Cardiff dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Cardiff dental websites are: “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (92% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Cardiff compare with the rest of Wales?
Cardiff's median score of 71 is 1.5 points above the Wales-wide median of 69.50, based on 318 audited websites across Wales.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Cardiff in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Wales benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Cardiff figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.