Skip to main content
All benchmarks

Dental Website SEO Benchmark: Wales (2026)

Based on 283 audited dental websites in Wales, from 361 attempted domains. Cohort dps-37-v1.

Browse the Wales practice directory

Wales practices scored a median of 70, matching the national median of 70. The largest difference versus the national cohort (n=9,840) was clear booking action not detected: 68.20% of 283 Wales sites, 10.29 percentage points higher than the national rate. Wales's strongest other relative result was missing canonical tags, with the observed gap 0.86 percentage points below the national rate.

70

Median score

0 vs national median 70

67.53

Mean score

−0.20 vs national mean 67.73

283

Websites checked

Nationwide: 9,840 websites checked

78.39%

Auditable rate

+5.56 pp vs national 72.83% (9,840 of 13,511); state base 283 of 361

Score distribution

Grade distribution

Percentages use all 283 audited Wales domains as the base.

A

1.06%

3 of 283

B

14.84%

42 of 283

C

37.10%

105 of 283

D

21.91%

62 of 283

F

25.09%

71 of 283

Category detail

Average category scores

Each average uses the same 283-domain audited base. Local SEO is shown only as a labelled detail because three inputs were not evaluated in this cohort.

57.34

Website fundamentals

Average across 283 websites

63.60

AI visibility

Average across 283 websites

54.24

Patient trust

Average across 283 websites

94.47

Local SEO

Partial; upward-biased

Largest absolute difference first

Metric rates versus the national cohort

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in this bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage below shows its observation base.

Wales metric rates compared with national rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
MetricWales rateNational rateDifference vs national
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey68.20%193 of 28357.91%8,627 websites+10.29 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey87.99%249 of 28380.31%8,627 websites+7.68 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data96.47%273 of 28388.90%8,627 websites+7.57 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data72.79%206 of 28365.42%8,627 websites+7.37 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data97.88%277 of 28391.00%8,627 websites+6.88 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey65.02%184 of 28358.49%8,627 websites+6.53 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals47.00%133 of 28340.51%8,627 websites+6.49 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data97.17%275 of 28391.12%8,627 websites+6.05 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals56.18%159 of 28350.77%8,627 websites+5.41 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey88.34%250 of 28383.30%8,627 websites+5.04 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey42.40%120 of 28337.54%8,627 websites+4.86 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey69.96%198 of 28367.06%8,627 websites+2.90 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data54.42%154 of 28352.32%8,627 websites+2.10 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals34.28%97 of 28332.75%8,627 websites+1.53 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals40.28%114 of 28341.14%8,627 websites−0.86 pp
DNS failureCrawl accessibility12.19%44 of 36111.53%10,967 websites+0.66 pp
robots.txt restrictionCrawl accessibility0.00%0 of 3610.46%10,967 websites−0.46 pp
Other crawl failureCrawl accessibility3.32%12 of 3613.71%10,967 websites−0.39 pp
Other HTTP errorCrawl accessibility2.77%10 of 3612.40%10,967 websites+0.37 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals61.48%174 of 28361.85%8,627 websites−0.37 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals64.66%183 of 28364.46%8,627 websites+0.20 pp
HTTP 403 responseCrawl accessibility3.05%11 of 3612.92%10,967 websites+0.13 pp
Invalid responseCrawl accessibility0.00%0 of 3610.11%10,967 websites−0.11 pp
TimeoutCrawl accessibility0.28%1 of 3610.21%10,967 websites+0.07 pp

Largest audited city-state samples

Top Wales markets in the cohort

Markets are ordered by audited-domain count. Each row gives its own base; these are descriptive cohort cuts, not city rankings.

Top ten Wales city-state markets by audited-domain count
MarketAudited domainsMedian score
Cardiff, WLS5771
Swansea, WLS2876
Newport, WLS1653
Carmarthen, WLS1274.50
Wrexham, WLS1274.50
Bridgend, WLS1067
Cwmbran, WLS764
Bangor, WLS672
Aberdare, WLS558
Llanelli, WLS576

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Wales

How do Wales dental practice websites score?
Across 283 audited Wales dental websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 70 out of 100 — equal to the national median of 70. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks.
What do Wales dental websites most often get wrong?
The most widespread gaps observed in the Wales cohort are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (98% of audited sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (97% of audited sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (96% of audited sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How can I compare my dental practice website with the Wales average?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

What this study measures—and what it does not

Cohort. The completed production run attempted 13,511 normalized United Kingdom practice domains and successfully audited 9,840 of them. Website-level findings use one deterministic representative candidate per domain, avoiding duplicate-domain weighting.

Collection window. Public pages were crawled on 23–24 August 2026 using methodology dps-37-v1. The bounded HTTP crawler inspected robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages. Browser rendering was not used for this index run.

Scoring. The DentalPresence Score averages four deterministic category scores. Three Local SEO inputs—Google Business Profile, cross-directory NAP consistency, and service coverage—were not evaluated in this open-data backfill, so the Local SEO average is partial and upward-biased.

Detection limits. A signal not detected in three pages may exist elsewhere, be injected only after JavaScript rendering, or use markup the parser did not recognize. The high “orphan page” result was excluded from headline recommendations because a bounded crawl cannot establish sitewide orphan status reliably.

Sampling. This is a large matched open-place cohort, not a probability sample of every United Kingdom dental practice. It should not be used to estimate national market share or infer the quality of any individual practice.

No causal claims. The study did not use rankings, traffic, conversions, clinical data, credentials, safety records, or patient outcomes. A failed check is an observable website signal, not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The state benchmark describes a cohort, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice.