Skip to main content
British Columbia benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: New Westminster, BC

Live figures from 39 indexable audited New Westminster dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

77

median score

+5.00 vs British Columbia median 72

72.92

average score

British Columbia average: 69.74

83.50

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

39

websites audited

of 1,994 across British Columbia

Score distribution

Grade distribution in New Westminster

Counts use all 39 indexable audited New Westminster websites.

A

7.69%

3 of 39

B

33.33%

13 of 39

C

23.08%

9 of 39

D

15.38%

6 of 39

F

20.51%

8 of 39

British Columbia distribution: A 3% · B 27% · C 25% · D 21% · F 24% (1,994 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where New Westminster dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 New Westminster websites are omitted.

95%

FAQPage structured data not detected

37 of 39 evaluated New Westminster websites — vs 92.93% across British Columbia.

92%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

36 of 39 evaluated New Westminster websites — vs 94.28% across British Columbia.

90%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

35 of 39 evaluated New Westminster websites — vs 95.34% across British Columbia.

New Westminster check rates compared with British Columbia rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckNew Westminster rateBritish Columbia rateDifference
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data28.21%11 of 39 evaluated47.09%939 of 1,994 evaluated−18.88 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey53.85%21 of 39 evaluated68.05%1,357 of 1,994 evaluated−14.20 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals17.95%7 of 39 evaluated29.94%597 of 1,994 evaluated−11.99 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals79.49%31 of 39 evaluated68.91%1,374 of 1,994 evaluated+10.58 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals53.85%21 of 39 evaluated43.28%863 of 1,994 evaluated+10.57 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals35.90%14 of 39 evaluated46.19%921 of 1,994 evaluated−10.29 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey56.41%22 of 39 evaluated66.55%1,327 of 1,994 evaluated−10.14 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data58.97%23 of 39 evaluated68.86%1,373 of 1,994 evaluated−9.89 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey69.23%27 of 39 evaluated75.33%1,502 of 1,994 evaluated−6.10 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey79.49%31 of 39 evaluated73.72%1,470 of 1,994 evaluated+5.77 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data89.74%35 of 39 evaluated95.34%1,901 of 1,994 evaluated−5.60 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey69.23%27 of 39 evaluated63.69%1,270 of 1,994 evaluated+5.54 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey51.28%20 of 39 evaluated53.61%1,069 of 1,994 evaluated−2.33 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data92.31%36 of 39 evaluated94.28%1,880 of 1,994 evaluated−1.97 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data94.87%37 of 39 evaluated92.93%1,853 of 1,994 evaluated+1.94 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals33.33%13 of 39 evaluated35.01%698 of 1,994 evaluated−1.68 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals58.97%23 of 39 evaluated59.08%1,178 of 1,994 evaluated−0.11 pp

2026 Canada study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 11,797-website 2026 Canada study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Emergency-services page not detected69.35%

Clear booking action not detected56.82%

Insurance or payment page not detected78.50%

Privacy-policy link not detected67.52%

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected50.03%

AggregateRating structured data not detected94.43%

FAQ page not detected73.93%

Limited useful content43.84%

XML sitemap not detected31.14%

Missing canonical tags35.19%

Missing meta descriptions46.44%

Unclear H1 structure59.50%

Contact or inquiry form not detected62.02%

FAQPage structured data not detected93.76%

Service or treatment structured data not detected93.63%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected71.15%

Images missing alternative text69.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for New Westminster

How good are dental practice websites in New Westminster?
Across 39 audited New Westminster dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 77 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 83.50 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do New Westminster dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited New Westminster dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (92% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (90% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in New Westminster compare with the rest of British Columbia?
New Westminster's median score of 77 is 5 points above the British Columbia-wide median of 72, based on 1,994 audited websites across British Columbia.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for New Westminster in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the British Columbia benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The New Westminster figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.