Skip to main content
British Columbia benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Maple Ridge, BC

Live figures from 35 indexable audited Maple Ridge dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 2, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

74

median score

+2.00 vs British Columbia median 72

71.57

average score

British Columbia average: 69.74

83.50

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

35

websites audited

of 1,994 across British Columbia

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Maple Ridge

Counts use all 35 indexable audited Maple Ridge websites.

A

2.86%

1 of 35

B

42.86%

15 of 35

C

14.29%

5 of 35

D

17.14%

6 of 35

F

22.86%

8 of 35

British Columbia distribution: A 3% · B 28% · C 25% · D 21% · F 24% (1,994 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Maple Ridge dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Maple Ridge websites are omitted.

100%

FAQPage structured data not detected

35 of 35 evaluated Maple Ridge websites — vs 92.93% across British Columbia.

100%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

35 of 35 evaluated Maple Ridge websites — vs 95.29% across British Columbia.

97%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

34 of 35 evaluated Maple Ridge websites — vs 94.28% across British Columbia.

Maple Ridge check rates compared with British Columbia rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckMaple Ridge rateBritish Columbia rateDifference
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data45.71%16 of 35 evaluated68.86%1,373 of 1,994 evaluated−23.15 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey54.29%19 of 35 evaluated68.05%1,357 of 1,994 evaluated−13.76 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey42.86%15 of 35 evaluated53.61%1,069 of 1,994 evaluated−10.75 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals34.29%12 of 35 evaluated43.28%863 of 1,994 evaluated−8.99 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals77.14%27 of 35 evaluated68.91%1,374 of 1,994 evaluated+8.23 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals22.86%8 of 35 evaluated29.94%597 of 1,994 evaluated−7.08 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data100.00%35 of 35 evaluated92.93%1,853 of 1,994 evaluated+7.07 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey68.57%24 of 35 evaluated73.72%1,470 of 1,994 evaluated−5.15 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals54.29%19 of 35 evaluated59.08%1,178 of 1,994 evaluated−4.79 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data100.00%35 of 35 evaluated95.29%1,900 of 1,994 evaluated+4.71 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data42.86%15 of 35 evaluated47.09%939 of 1,994 evaluated−4.23 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey60.00%21 of 35 evaluated63.69%1,270 of 1,994 evaluated−3.69 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey62.86%22 of 35 evaluated66.55%1,327 of 1,994 evaluated−3.69 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals31.43%11 of 35 evaluated35.01%698 of 1,994 evaluated−3.58 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals42.86%15 of 35 evaluated46.19%921 of 1,994 evaluated−3.33 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data97.14%34 of 35 evaluated94.28%1,880 of 1,994 evaluated+2.86 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey77.14%27 of 35 evaluated75.33%1,502 of 1,994 evaluated+1.81 pp

2026 Canada study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 11,797-website 2026 Canada study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Emergency-services page not detected69.35%

Clear booking action not detected56.82%

Insurance or payment page not detected78.50%

Privacy-policy link not detected67.52%

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected50.03%

AggregateRating structured data not detected94.43%

FAQ page not detected73.93%

Limited useful content43.84%

XML sitemap not detected31.14%

Missing canonical tags35.19%

Missing meta descriptions46.44%

Unclear H1 structure59.50%

Contact or inquiry form not detected62.02%

FAQPage structured data not detected93.76%

Service or treatment structured data not detected93.63%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected71.15%

Images missing alternative text69.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Maple Ridge

How good are dental practice websites in Maple Ridge?
Across 35 audited Maple Ridge dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 74 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 83.50 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Maple Ridge dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Maple Ridge dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Maple Ridge compare with the rest of British Columbia?
Maple Ridge's median score of 74 is 2 points above the British Columbia-wide median of 72, based on 1,994 audited websites across British Columbia.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Maple Ridge in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the British Columbia benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Maple Ridge figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.