Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Kenosha, WI
Live figures from 31 indexable audited Kenosha dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.
73
median score
−1.00 vs Wisconsin median 74
70.26
average score
Wisconsin average: 71.24
80
top quartile
the score the best 25% of local websites clear
31
websites audited
of 1,423 across Wisconsin
Score distribution
Grade distribution in Kenosha
Counts use all 31 indexable audited Kenosha websites.
A
3.23%
1 of 31
B
22.58%
7 of 31
C
35.48%
11 of 31
D
22.58%
7 of 31
F
16.13%
5 of 31
Wisconsin distribution: A 3% · B 28% · C 31% · D 18% · F 19% (1,423 websites).
Largest local difference first
Where Kenosha dental websites fall short
“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Kenosha websites are omitted.
97%
AggregateRating structured data not detected
30 of 31 evaluated Kenosha websites — vs 95.43% across Wisconsin.
90%
Service or treatment structured data not detected
28 of 31 evaluated Kenosha websites — vs 92.97% across Wisconsin.
87%
FAQPage structured data not detected
27 of 31 evaluated Kenosha websites — vs 96.56% across Wisconsin.
| Check | Kenosha rate | Wisconsin rate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey | 64.52%20 of 31 evaluated | 47.15%671 of 1,423 evaluated | +17.37 pp |
| Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey | 67.74%21 of 31 evaluated | 54.11%770 of 1,423 evaluated | +13.63 pp |
| Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals | 22.58%7 of 31 evaluated | 32.54%463 of 1,423 evaluated | −9.96 pp |
| BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data | 58.06%18 of 31 evaluated | 67.81%965 of 1,423 evaluated | −9.75 pp |
| FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data | 87.10%27 of 31 evaluated | 96.56%1,374 of 1,423 evaluated | −9.46 pp |
| Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey | 64.52%20 of 31 evaluated | 73.01%1,039 of 1,423 evaluated | −8.49 pp |
| Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data | 41.94%13 of 31 evaluated | 49.61%706 of 1,423 evaluated | −7.67 pp |
| Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals | 45.16%14 of 31 evaluated | 39.92%568 of 1,423 evaluated | +5.24 pp |
| XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals | 38.71%12 of 31 evaluated | 33.80%481 of 1,423 evaluated | +4.91 pp |
| Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals | 67.74%21 of 31 evaluated | 72.31%1,029 of 1,423 evaluated | −4.57 pp |
| Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey | 70.97%22 of 31 evaluated | 66.90%952 of 1,423 evaluated | +4.07 pp |
| Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey | 54.84%17 of 31 evaluated | 51.02%726 of 1,423 evaluated | +3.82 pp |
| Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data | 90.32%28 of 31 evaluated | 92.97%1,323 of 1,423 evaluated | −2.65 pp |
| Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals | 61.29%19 of 31 evaluated | 59.10%841 of 1,423 evaluated | +2.19 pp |
| AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data | 96.77%30 of 31 evaluated | 95.43%1,358 of 1,423 evaluated | +1.34 pp |
| FAQ page not detectedPatient journey | 70.97%22 of 31 evaluated | 70.27%1,000 of 1,423 evaluated | +0.70 pp |
| Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals | 41.94%13 of 31 evaluated | 41.46%590 of 1,423 evaluated | +0.48 pp |
2026 US study baseline
The frozen national picture for the same checks
Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%
Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%
Clear booking action not detected42.35%
Missing meta descriptions33.36%
Emergency-services page not detected58.40%
FAQ page not detected65.47%
Unclear H1 structure53.80%
Missing canonical tags26.14%
Limited useful content32.11%
Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%
FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%
Images missing alternative text74.25%
XML sitemap not detected24.75%
BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%
AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%
Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%
Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%
Explore the Kenosha market
Common questions
Dental SEO and website questions for Kenosha
- How good are dental practice websites in Kenosha?
- Across 31 audited Kenosha dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 73 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 80 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
- What do Kenosha dental websites most often get wrong?
- The most common gaps detected on audited Kenosha dental websites are: “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (90% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (87% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
- How does dental website quality in Kenosha compare with the rest of Wisconsin?
- Kenosha's median score of 73 is 1 point below the Wisconsin-wide median of 74, based on 1,423 audited websites across Wisconsin.
- How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
- Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.
Methodology and limitations
How these live figures are computed
Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Kenosha in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.
Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.
What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Wisconsin benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.
No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.
Use the benchmark
Score a dental website against the same framework
The Kenosha figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.