Skip to main content
Washington benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Marysville, WA

Live figures from 36 indexable audited Marysville dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 21, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

75

median score

0 vs Washington median 75

72.25

average score

Washington average: 71.43

85

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

36

websites audited

of 2,892 across Washington

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Marysville

Counts use all 36 indexable audited Marysville websites.

A

5.56%

2 of 36

B

33.33%

12 of 36

C

33.33%

12 of 36

D

8.33%

3 of 36

F

19.44%

7 of 36

Washington distribution: A 4% · B 33% · C 27% · D 17% · F 20% (2,892 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Marysville dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Marysville websites are omitted.

97%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

35 of 36 evaluated Marysville websites — vs 91.56% across Washington.

94%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

34 of 36 evaluated Marysville websites — vs 93.91% across Washington.

92%

FAQPage structured data not detected

33 of 36 evaluated Marysville websites — vs 96.23% across Washington.

Marysville check rates compared with Washington rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckMarysville rateWashington rateDifference
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey44.44%16 of 36 evaluated54.98%1,590 of 2,892 evaluated−10.54 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey52.78%19 of 36 evaluated63.04%1,823 of 2,892 evaluated−10.26 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey58.33%21 of 36 evaluated68.53%1,982 of 2,892 evaluated−10.20 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data97.22%35 of 36 evaluated91.56%2,648 of 2,892 evaluated+5.66 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey44.44%16 of 36 evaluated49.90%1,443 of 2,892 evaluated−5.46 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals33.33%12 of 36 evaluated38.62%1,117 of 2,892 evaluated−5.29 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals38.89%14 of 36 evaluated33.68%974 of 2,892 evaluated+5.21 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data91.67%33 of 36 evaluated96.23%2,783 of 2,892 evaluated−4.56 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey69.44%25 of 36 evaluated73.79%2,134 of 2,892 evaluated−4.35 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals44.44%16 of 36 evaluated40.25%1,164 of 2,892 evaluated+4.19 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals30.56%11 of 36 evaluated33.09%957 of 2,892 evaluated−2.53 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey50.00%18 of 36 evaluated48.27%1,396 of 2,892 evaluated+1.73 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data44.44%16 of 36 evaluated45.64%1,320 of 2,892 evaluated−1.20 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals66.67%24 of 36 evaluated67.50%1,952 of 2,892 evaluated−0.83 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data94.44%34 of 36 evaluated93.91%2,716 of 2,892 evaluated+0.53 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data69.44%25 of 36 evaluated69.71%2,016 of 2,892 evaluated−0.27 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals58.33%21 of 36 evaluated58.06%1,679 of 2,892 evaluated+0.27 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Marysville

How good are dental practice websites in Marysville?
Across 36 audited Marysville dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 75 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 85 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Marysville dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Marysville dental websites are: “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (94% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (92% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Marysville compare with the rest of Washington?
Marysville's median score of 75 is equal to the Washington-wide median of 75, based on 2,892 audited websites across Washington.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Marysville in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Washington benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Marysville figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.