Skip to main content
Virginia benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Burke, VA

Live figures from 30 indexable audited Burke dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 21, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

79

median score

+3.00 vs Virginia median 76

74.87

average score

Virginia average: 72.06

83.75

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

30

websites audited

of 2,623 across Virginia

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Burke

Counts use all 30 indexable audited Burke websites.

A

20.00%

6 of 30

B

26.67%

8 of 30

C

23.33%

7 of 30

D

13.33%

4 of 30

F

16.67%

5 of 30

Virginia distribution: A 6% · B 34% · C 26% · D 14% · F 21% (2,623 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Burke dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Burke websites are omitted.

97%

FAQPage structured data not detected

29 of 30 evaluated Burke websites — vs 96.19% across Virginia.

93%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

28 of 30 evaluated Burke websites — vs 90.35% across Virginia.

87%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

26 of 30 evaluated Burke websites — vs 90.09% across Virginia.

Burke check rates compared with Virginia rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckBurke rateVirginia rateDifference
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals23.33%7 of 30 evaluated38.39%1,007 of 2,623 evaluated−15.06 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey60.00%18 of 30 evaluated70.80%1,857 of 2,623 evaluated−10.80 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals30.00%9 of 30 evaluated39.69%1,041 of 2,623 evaluated−9.69 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey50.00%15 of 30 evaluated59.51%1,561 of 2,623 evaluated−9.51 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data60.00%18 of 30 evaluated67.98%1,783 of 2,623 evaluated−7.98 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals26.67%8 of 30 evaluated33.55%880 of 2,623 evaluated−6.88 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals50.00%15 of 30 evaluated55.74%1,462 of 2,623 evaluated−5.74 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey60.00%18 of 30 evaluated54.63%1,433 of 2,623 evaluated+5.37 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey43.33%13 of 30 evaluated47.69%1,251 of 2,623 evaluated−4.36 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data86.67%26 of 30 evaluated90.09%2,363 of 2,623 evaluated−3.42 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey43.33%13 of 30 evaluated46.47%1,219 of 2,623 evaluated−3.14 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data93.33%28 of 30 evaluated90.35%2,370 of 2,623 evaluated+2.98 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey70.00%21 of 30 evaluated67.90%1,781 of 2,623 evaluated+2.10 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals70.00%21 of 30 evaluated68.39%1,794 of 2,623 evaluated+1.61 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals33.33%10 of 30 evaluated32.18%844 of 2,623 evaluated+1.15 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data96.67%29 of 30 evaluated96.19%2,523 of 2,623 evaluated+0.48 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data43.33%13 of 30 evaluated43.31%1,136 of 2,623 evaluated+0.02 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Burke

How good are dental practice websites in Burke?
Across 30 audited Burke dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 79 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 83.75 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Burke dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Burke dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (93% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (87% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Burke compare with the rest of Virginia?
Burke's median score of 79 is 3 points above the Virginia-wide median of 76, based on 2,623 audited websites across Virginia.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Burke in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Virginia benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Burke figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.