Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: American Fork, UT
Live figures from 39 indexable audited American Fork dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.
73
median score
−2.00 vs Utah median 75
72.51
average score
Utah average: 71.55
84
top quartile
the score the best 25% of local websites clear
39
websites audited
of 1,267 across Utah
Score distribution
Grade distribution in American Fork
Counts use all 39 indexable audited American Fork websites.
A
0.00%
0 of 39
B
38.46%
15 of 39
C
30.77%
12 of 39
D
17.95%
7 of 39
F
12.82%
5 of 39
Utah distribution: A 4% · B 32% · C 27% · D 17% · F 19% (1,267 websites).
Largest local difference first
Where American Fork dental websites fall short
“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 American Fork websites are omitted.
97%
Service or treatment structured data not detected
38 of 39 evaluated American Fork websites — vs 94.87% across Utah.
97%
FAQPage structured data not detected
38 of 39 evaluated American Fork websites — vs 95.34% across Utah.
85%
AggregateRating structured data not detected
33 of 39 evaluated American Fork websites — vs 89.50% across Utah.
| Check | American Fork rate | Utah rate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey | 69.23%27 of 39 evaluated | 55.09%698 of 1,267 evaluated | +14.14 pp |
| Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals | 23.08%9 of 39 evaluated | 36.54%463 of 1,267 evaluated | −13.46 pp |
| Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey | 79.49%31 of 39 evaluated | 71.03%900 of 1,267 evaluated | +8.46 pp |
| Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals | 33.33%13 of 39 evaluated | 39.78%504 of 1,267 evaluated | −6.45 pp |
| Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals | 51.28%20 of 39 evaluated | 56.43%715 of 1,267 evaluated | −5.15 pp |
| AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data | 84.62%33 of 39 evaluated | 89.50%1,134 of 1,267 evaluated | −4.88 pp |
| XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals | 33.33%13 of 39 evaluated | 28.49%361 of 1,267 evaluated | +4.84 pp |
| Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals | 66.67%26 of 39 evaluated | 71.11%901 of 1,267 evaluated | −4.44 pp |
| Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey | 53.85%21 of 39 evaluated | 49.49%627 of 1,267 evaluated | +4.36 pp |
| Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey | 48.72%19 of 39 evaluated | 52.96%671 of 1,267 evaluated | −4.24 pp |
| Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey | 66.67%26 of 39 evaluated | 63.30%802 of 1,267 evaluated | +3.37 pp |
| BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data | 71.79%28 of 39 evaluated | 68.43%867 of 1,267 evaluated | +3.36 pp |
| Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data | 97.44%38 of 39 evaluated | 94.87%1,202 of 1,267 evaluated | +2.57 pp |
| Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data | 41.03%16 of 39 evaluated | 43.49%551 of 1,267 evaluated | −2.46 pp |
| FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data | 97.44%38 of 39 evaluated | 95.34%1,208 of 1,267 evaluated | +2.10 pp |
| Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals | 33.33%13 of 39 evaluated | 34.57%438 of 1,267 evaluated | −1.24 pp |
| FAQ page not detectedPatient journey | 69.23%27 of 39 evaluated | 69.14%876 of 1,267 evaluated | +0.09 pp |
2026 US study baseline
The frozen national picture for the same checks
Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%
Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%
Clear booking action not detected42.35%
Missing meta descriptions33.36%
Emergency-services page not detected58.40%
FAQ page not detected65.47%
Unclear H1 structure53.80%
Missing canonical tags26.14%
Limited useful content32.11%
Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%
FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%
Images missing alternative text74.25%
XML sitemap not detected24.75%
BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%
AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%
Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%
Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%
Explore the American Fork market
Common questions
Dental SEO and website questions for American Fork
- How good are dental practice websites in American Fork?
- Across 39 audited American Fork dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 73 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 84 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
- What do American Fork dental websites most often get wrong?
- The most common gaps detected on audited American Fork dental websites are: “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (85% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
- How does dental website quality in American Fork compare with the rest of Utah?
- American Fork's median score of 73 is 2 points below the Utah-wide median of 75, based on 1,267 audited websites across Utah.
- How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
- Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.
Methodology and limitations
How these live figures are computed
Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for American Fork in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.
Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.
What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Utah benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.
No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.
Use the benchmark
Score a dental website against the same framework
The American Fork figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.