Skip to main content
Texas benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: The Woodlands, TX

Live figures from 72 indexable audited The Woodlands dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 21, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

77.50

median score

+1.50 vs Texas median 76

74.71

average score

Texas average: 72.29

85

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

72

websites audited

of 8,703 across Texas

Score distribution

Grade distribution in The Woodlands

Counts use all 72 indexable audited The Woodlands websites.

A

2.78%

2 of 72

B

43.06%

31 of 72

C

31.94%

23 of 72

D

8.33%

6 of 72

F

13.89%

10 of 72

Texas distribution: A 5% · B 36% · C 27% · D 12% · F 20% (8,703 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where The Woodlands dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 The Woodlands websites are omitted.

97%

FAQPage structured data not detected

70 of 72 evaluated The Woodlands websites — vs 95.30% across Texas.

93%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

67 of 72 evaluated The Woodlands websites — vs 91.57% across Texas.

90%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

65 of 72 evaluated The Woodlands websites — vs 91.83% across Texas.

The Woodlands check rates compared with Texas rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckThe Woodlands rateTexas rateDifference
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data29.17%21 of 72 evaluated43.11%3,752 of 8,703 evaluated−13.94 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals26.39%19 of 72 evaluated38.68%3,366 of 8,703 evaluated−12.29 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey36.11%26 of 72 evaluated45.82%3,988 of 8,703 evaluated−9.71 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey50.00%36 of 72 evaluated45.42%3,953 of 8,703 evaluated+4.58 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey50.00%36 of 72 evaluated53.14%4,625 of 8,703 evaluated−3.14 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey56.94%41 of 72 evaluated60.03%5,224 of 8,703 evaluated−3.09 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data63.89%46 of 72 evaluated66.85%5,818 of 8,703 evaluated−2.96 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals34.72%25 of 72 evaluated36.95%3,216 of 8,703 evaluated−2.23 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals31.94%23 of 72 evaluated34.10%2,968 of 8,703 evaluated−2.16 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data97.22%70 of 72 evaluated95.30%8,294 of 8,703 evaluated+1.92 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals68.06%49 of 72 evaluated66.36%5,775 of 8,703 evaluated+1.70 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey68.06%49 of 72 evaluated69.63%6,060 of 8,703 evaluated−1.57 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data90.28%65 of 72 evaluated91.83%7,992 of 8,703 evaluated−1.55 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data93.06%67 of 72 evaluated91.57%7,969 of 8,703 evaluated+1.49 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals54.17%39 of 72 evaluated55.43%4,824 of 8,703 evaluated−1.26 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey68.06%49 of 72 evaluated67.41%5,867 of 8,703 evaluated+0.65 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals31.94%23 of 72 evaluated31.78%2,766 of 8,703 evaluated+0.16 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for The Woodlands

How good are dental practice websites in The Woodlands?
Across 72 audited The Woodlands dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 77.50 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 85 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do The Woodlands dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited The Woodlands dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (93% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (90% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in The Woodlands compare with the rest of Texas?
The Woodlands's median score of 77.50 is 1.5 points above the Texas-wide median of 76, based on 8,703 audited websites across Texas.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for The Woodlands in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Texas benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The The Woodlands figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.