Skip to main content
Texas benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Bellaire, TX

Live figures from 35 indexable audited Bellaire dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 4, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

73

median score

−3.00 vs Texas median 76

69.86

average score

Texas average: 72.29

83.50

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

35

websites audited

of 8,703 across Texas

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Bellaire

Counts use all 35 indexable audited Bellaire websites.

A

5.71%

2 of 35

B

25.71%

9 of 35

C

31.43%

11 of 35

D

14.29%

5 of 35

F

22.86%

8 of 35

Texas distribution: A 5% · B 36% · C 27% · D 12% · F 20% (8,703 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Bellaire dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Bellaire websites are omitted.

97%

FAQPage structured data not detected

34 of 35 evaluated Bellaire websites — vs 95.30% across Texas.

94%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

33 of 35 evaluated Bellaire websites — vs 91.83% across Texas.

91%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

32 of 35 evaluated Bellaire websites — vs 91.57% across Texas.

Bellaire check rates compared with Texas rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckBellaire rateTexas rateDifference
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data85.71%30 of 35 evaluated66.87%5,820 of 8,703 evaluated+18.84 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals54.29%19 of 35 evaluated38.65%3,364 of 8,703 evaluated+15.64 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey74.29%26 of 35 evaluated60.03%5,224 of 8,703 evaluated+14.26 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals54.29%19 of 35 evaluated66.33%5,773 of 8,703 evaluated−12.04 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey62.86%22 of 35 evaluated53.14%4,625 of 8,703 evaluated+9.72 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey62.86%22 of 35 evaluated69.64%6,061 of 8,703 evaluated−6.78 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals42.86%15 of 35 evaluated36.94%3,215 of 8,703 evaluated+5.92 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey40.00%14 of 35 evaluated45.86%3,991 of 8,703 evaluated−5.86 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals37.14%13 of 35 evaluated31.79%2,767 of 8,703 evaluated+5.35 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey71.43%25 of 35 evaluated67.43%5,868 of 8,703 evaluated+4.00 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey48.57%17 of 35 evaluated45.42%3,953 of 8,703 evaluated+3.15 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data45.71%16 of 35 evaluated43.10%3,751 of 8,703 evaluated+2.61 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data94.29%33 of 35 evaluated91.83%7,992 of 8,703 evaluated+2.46 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data97.14%34 of 35 evaluated95.30%8,294 of 8,703 evaluated+1.84 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals54.29%19 of 35 evaluated55.44%4,825 of 8,703 evaluated−1.15 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals34.29%12 of 35 evaluated34.11%2,969 of 8,703 evaluated+0.18 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data91.43%32 of 35 evaluated91.57%7,969 of 8,703 evaluated−0.14 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Bellaire

How good are dental practice websites in Bellaire?
Across 35 audited Bellaire dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 73 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 83.50 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Bellaire dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Bellaire dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (94% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (91% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Bellaire compare with the rest of Texas?
Bellaire's median score of 73 is 3 points below the Texas-wide median of 76, based on 8,703 audited websites across Texas.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Bellaire in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Texas benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Bellaire figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.