Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Memphis, TN
Live figures from 121 indexable audited Memphis dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.
71
median score
−3.00 vs Tennessee median 74
68.71
average score
Tennessee average: 71.10
81
top quartile
the score the best 25% of local websites clear
121
websites audited
of 1,740 across Tennessee
Score distribution
Grade distribution in Memphis
Counts use all 121 indexable audited Memphis websites.
A
4.13%
5 of 121
B
27.27%
33 of 121
C
21.49%
26 of 121
D
20.66%
25 of 121
F
26.45%
32 of 121
Tennessee distribution: A 4% · B 31% · C 27% · D 17% · F 21% (1,740 websites).
Largest local difference first
Where Memphis dental websites fall short
“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Memphis websites are omitted.
98%
AggregateRating structured data not detected
118 of 121 evaluated Memphis websites — vs 92.64% across Tennessee.
96%
FAQPage structured data not detected
116 of 121 evaluated Memphis websites — vs 95.98% across Tennessee.
91%
Service or treatment structured data not detected
110 of 121 evaluated Memphis websites — vs 90.23% across Tennessee.
| Check | Memphis rate | Tennessee rate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals | 48.76%59 of 121 evaluated | 36.26%631 of 1,740 evaluated | +12.50 pp |
| BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data | 76.86%93 of 121 evaluated | 67.82%1,180 of 1,740 evaluated | +9.04 pp |
| Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data | 55.37%67 of 121 evaluated | 47.99%835 of 1,740 evaluated | +7.38 pp |
| Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals | 48.76%59 of 121 evaluated | 41.55%723 of 1,740 evaluated | +7.21 pp |
| Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey | 80.99%98 of 121 evaluated | 74.37%1,294 of 1,740 evaluated | +6.62 pp |
| Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey | 62.81%76 of 121 evaluated | 57.70%1,004 of 1,740 evaluated | +5.11 pp |
| AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data | 97.52%118 of 121 evaluated | 92.64%1,612 of 1,740 evaluated | +4.88 pp |
| Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals | 52.89%64 of 121 evaluated | 57.30%997 of 1,740 evaluated | −4.41 pp |
| Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals | 45.45%55 of 121 evaluated | 41.49%722 of 1,740 evaluated | +3.96 pp |
| FAQ page not detectedPatient journey | 62.81%76 of 121 evaluated | 66.44%1,156 of 1,740 evaluated | −3.63 pp |
| Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey | 54.55%66 of 121 evaluated | 52.24%909 of 1,740 evaluated | +2.31 pp |
| Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey | 65.29%79 of 121 evaluated | 67.41%1,173 of 1,740 evaluated | −2.12 pp |
| XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals | 33.88%41 of 121 evaluated | 31.84%554 of 1,740 evaluated | +2.04 pp |
| Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals | 67.77%82 of 121 evaluated | 69.48%1,209 of 1,740 evaluated | −1.71 pp |
| Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey | 45.45%55 of 121 evaluated | 44.60%776 of 1,740 evaluated | +0.85 pp |
| Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data | 90.91%110 of 121 evaluated | 90.23%1,570 of 1,740 evaluated | +0.68 pp |
| FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data | 95.87%116 of 121 evaluated | 95.98%1,670 of 1,740 evaluated | −0.11 pp |
2026 US study baseline
The frozen national picture for the same checks
Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%
Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%
Clear booking action not detected42.35%
Missing meta descriptions33.36%
Emergency-services page not detected58.40%
FAQ page not detected65.47%
Unclear H1 structure53.80%
Missing canonical tags26.14%
Limited useful content32.11%
Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%
FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%
Images missing alternative text74.25%
XML sitemap not detected24.75%
BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%
AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%
Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%
Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%
Explore the Memphis market
Common questions
Dental SEO and website questions for Memphis
- How good are dental practice websites in Memphis?
- Across 121 audited Memphis dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 71 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 81 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
- What do Memphis dental websites most often get wrong?
- The most common gaps detected on audited Memphis dental websites are: “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (98% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (96% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (91% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
- How does dental website quality in Memphis compare with the rest of Tennessee?
- Memphis's median score of 71 is 3 points below the Tennessee-wide median of 74, based on 1,740 audited websites across Tennessee.
- How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
- Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.
Methodology and limitations
How these live figures are computed
Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Memphis in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.
Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.
What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Tennessee benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.
No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.
Use the benchmark
Score a dental website against the same framework
The Memphis figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.