Skip to main content
All benchmarks

Dental Website SEO Benchmark: Rhode Island (2026)

Based on 123 audited dental websites in Rhode Island, from 173 attempted domains. Cohort dps-37-v1.

Browse the Rhode Island practice directory

Rhode Island practices scored a median of 73, 4 points below the national median of 77. The largest difference versus the national cohort (n=50,405) was insurance or payment page not detected: 67.48% of 123 Rhode Island sites, 16.08 percentage points higher than the national rate. No other measured website-gap rate was below the corresponding national rate.

73

Median score

−4.00 vs national median 77

70.97

Mean score

−3.16 vs national mean 74.13

123

Websites checked

Nationwide: 50,405 websites checked

71.10%

Auditable rate

+0.43 pp vs national 70.67% (50,405 of 71,323); state base 123 of 173

Score distribution

Grade distribution

Percentages use all 123 audited Rhode Island domains as the base.

A

0.81%

1 of 123

B

24.39%

30 of 123

C

34.96%

43 of 123

D

24.39%

30 of 123

F

15.45%

19 of 123

Category detail

Average category scores

Each average uses the same 123-domain audited base. Local SEO is shown only as a labelled detail because three inputs were not evaluated in this cohort.

58.15

Website fundamentals

Average across 123 websites

65.30

AI visibility

Average across 123 websites

63.58

Patient trust

Average across 123 websites

96.49

Local SEO

Partial; upward-biased

Largest absolute difference first

Metric rates versus the national cohort

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in this bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage below shows its observation base.

Rhode Island metric rates compared with national rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
MetricRhode Island rateNational rateDifference vs national
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey67.48%83 of 12351.40%50,405 websites+16.08 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey70.73%87 of 12358.40%50,405 websites+12.33 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey53.66%66 of 12342.35%50,405 websites+11.31 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data73.17%90 of 12363.60%50,405 websites+9.57 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey50.41%62 of 12342.09%50,405 websites+8.32 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data98.37%121 of 12391.06%50,405 websites+7.31 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals81.30%100 of 12374.25%50,405 websites+7.05 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals32.52%40 of 12326.14%50,405 websites+6.38 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals60.16%74 of 12353.80%50,405 websites+6.36 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey71.54%88 of 12365.47%50,405 websites+6.07 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data44.72%55 of 12338.72%50,405 websites+6.00 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data95.93%118 of 12391.90%50,405 websites+4.03 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals35.77%44 of 12332.11%50,405 websites+3.66 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals36.59%45 of 12333.36%50,405 websites+3.23 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals27.64%34 of 12324.75%50,405 websites+2.89 pp
DNS failureCrawl accessibility13.29%23 of 17310.68%71,323 websites+2.61 pp
robots.txt restrictionCrawl accessibility2.31%4 of 1733.82%71,323 websites−1.51 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey69.92%86 of 12368.70%50,405 websites+1.22 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data96.75%119 of 12395.57%50,405 websites+1.18 pp
HTTP 403 responseCrawl accessibility6.94%12 of 1738.09%71,323 websites−1.15 pp
Invalid responseCrawl accessibility0.00%0 of 1730.38%71,323 websites−0.38 pp
TimeoutCrawl accessibility0.58%1 of 1730.40%71,323 websites+0.18 pp
Other crawl failureCrawl accessibility4.05%7 of 1734.22%71,323 websites−0.17 pp
Other HTTP errorCrawl accessibility1.73%3 of 1731.73%71,323 websites0 pp

Largest audited city-state samples

Top Rhode Island markets in the cohort

Markets are ordered by audited-domain count. Each row gives its own base; these are descriptive cohort cuts, not city rankings.

Top ten Rhode Island city-state markets by audited-domain count
MarketAudited domainsMedian score
Providence, RI1674
Warwick, RI1664.50
Cranston, RI1273.50
Cumberland, RI579
East Greenwich, RI583
Johnston, RI580
Pawtucket, RI572
Westerly, RI569
West Warwick, RI571
Middletown, RI472

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Rhode Island

How do Rhode Island dental practice websites score?
Across 123 audited Rhode Island dental websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 73 out of 100 — 4 points below the national median of 77. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks.
What do Rhode Island dental websites most often get wrong?
The most widespread gaps observed in the Rhode Island cohort are: “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (98% of audited sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (97% of audited sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (96% of audited sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How can I compare my dental practice website with the Rhode Island average?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

What this study measures—and what it does not

Cohort. The completed production run covered 109,408 matched practice-location candidates across 71,323 normalized domains. Website-level findings use one deterministic representative candidate for each of the 50,405 successfully crawled domains, avoiding duplicate-domain weighting.

Collection window. Public pages were crawled on 2–3 August 2026 using methodology dps-37-v1. The bounded HTTP crawler inspected robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages. Browser rendering was not used for this index run.

Scoring. The DentalPresence Score averages four deterministic category scores. Three Local SEO inputs—Google Business Profile, cross-directory NAP consistency, and service coverage—were not evaluated in this open-data backfill, so the Local SEO average is partial and upward-biased.

Detection limits. A signal not detected in three pages may exist elsewhere, be injected only after JavaScript rendering, or use markup the parser did not recognize. The high “orphan page” result was excluded from headline recommendations because a bounded crawl cannot establish sitewide orphan status reliably.

Sampling. This is a large matched open-place cohort, not a probability sample of every U.S. dental office. It should not be used to estimate national market share or infer the quality of any individual practice.

No causal claims. The study did not use rankings, traffic, conversions, clinical data, credentials, safety records, or patient outcomes. A failed check is an observable website signal, not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The state benchmark describes a cohort, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice.