Skip to main content
Quebec benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Longueuil, QC

Live figures from 51 indexable audited Longueuil dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit August 28, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

68

median score

+2.00 vs Quebec median 66

64.45

average score

Quebec average: 64.26

71.50

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

51

websites audited

of 1,917 across Quebec

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Longueuil

Counts use all 51 indexable audited Longueuil websites.

A

0.00%

0 of 51

B

3.92%

2 of 51

C

27.45%

14 of 51

D

39.22%

20 of 51

F

29.41%

15 of 51

Quebec distribution: A 0% · B 5% · C 30% · D 35% · F 30% (1,917 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Longueuil dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Longueuil websites are omitted.

100%

Emergency-services page not detected

51 of 51 evaluated Longueuil websites — vs 95.20% across Quebec.

100%

Insurance or payment page not detected

51 of 51 evaluated Longueuil websites — vs 95.31% across Quebec.

100%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

51 of 51 evaluated Longueuil websites — vs 97.76% across Quebec.

Longueuil check rates compared with Quebec rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckLongueuil rateQuebec rateDifference
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals25.49%13 of 51 evaluated46.74%896 of 1,917 evaluated−21.25 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data60.78%31 of 51 evaluated67.97%1,303 of 1,917 evaluated−7.19 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals29.41%15 of 51 evaluated36.41%698 of 1,917 evaluated−7.00 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey58.82%30 of 51 evaluated65.31%1,252 of 1,917 evaluated−6.49 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey94.12%48 of 51 evaluated87.95%1,686 of 1,917 evaluated+6.17 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals45.10%23 of 51 evaluated50.70%972 of 1,917 evaluated−5.60 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data54.90%28 of 51 evaluated60.35%1,157 of 1,917 evaluated−5.45 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals39.22%20 of 51 evaluated33.91%650 of 1,917 evaluated+5.31 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey100.00%51 of 51 evaluated95.20%1,825 of 1,917 evaluated+4.80 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey100.00%51 of 51 evaluated95.31%1,827 of 1,917 evaluated+4.69 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data94.12%48 of 51 evaluated98.07%1,880 of 1,917 evaluated−3.95 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey90.20%46 of 51 evaluated86.59%1,660 of 1,917 evaluated+3.61 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals60.78%31 of 51 evaluated57.85%1,109 of 1,917 evaluated+2.93 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data100.00%51 of 51 evaluated97.76%1,874 of 1,917 evaluated+2.24 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey78.43%40 of 51 evaluated80.18%1,537 of 1,917 evaluated−1.75 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals70.59%36 of 51 evaluated71.31%1,367 of 1,917 evaluated−0.72 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data98.04%50 of 51 evaluated98.49%1,888 of 1,917 evaluated−0.45 pp

2026 Canada study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 11,797-website 2026 Canada study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Emergency-services page not detected69.35%

Clear booking action not detected56.82%

Insurance or payment page not detected78.50%

Privacy-policy link not detected67.52%

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected50.03%

AggregateRating structured data not detected94.43%

FAQ page not detected73.93%

Limited useful content43.84%

XML sitemap not detected31.14%

Missing canonical tags35.19%

Missing meta descriptions46.44%

Unclear H1 structure59.50%

Contact or inquiry form not detected62.02%

FAQPage structured data not detected93.76%

Service or treatment structured data not detected93.63%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected71.15%

Images missing alternative text69.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Longueuil

How good are dental practice websites in Longueuil?
Across 51 audited Longueuil dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 68 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 71.50 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Longueuil dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Longueuil dental websites are: “Emergency-services page not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “Insurance or payment page not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Longueuil compare with the rest of Quebec?
Longueuil's median score of 68 is 2 points above the Quebec-wide median of 66, based on 1,917 audited websites across Quebec.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Longueuil in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Quebec benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Longueuil figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.