Skip to main content
Ontario benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Richmond Hill, ON

Live figures from 113 indexable audited Richmond Hill dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

70

median score

−1.00 vs Ontario median 71

67.65

average score

Ontario average: 68.44

81

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

113

websites audited

of 5,448 across Ontario

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Richmond Hill

Counts use all 113 indexable audited Richmond Hill websites.

A

2.65%

3 of 113

B

25.66%

29 of 113

C

24.78%

28 of 113

D

17.70%

20 of 113

F

29.20%

33 of 113

Ontario distribution: A 3% · B 25% · C 25% · D 20% · F 27% (5,448 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Richmond Hill dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Richmond Hill websites are omitted.

96%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

109 of 113 evaluated Richmond Hill websites — vs 94.42% across Ontario.

95%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

107 of 113 evaluated Richmond Hill websites — vs 92.73% across Ontario.

92%

FAQPage structured data not detected

104 of 113 evaluated Richmond Hill websites — vs 93.12% across Ontario.

Richmond Hill check rates compared with Ontario rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckRichmond Hill rateOntario rateDifference
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey77.88%88 of 113 evaluated67.24%3,663 of 5,448 evaluated+10.64 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey53.98%61 of 113 evaluated61.25%3,337 of 5,448 evaluated−7.27 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey71.68%81 of 113 evaluated65.23%3,554 of 5,448 evaluated+6.45 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data57.52%65 of 113 evaluated51.41%2,801 of 5,448 evaluated+6.11 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals43.36%49 of 113 evaluated37.83%2,061 of 5,448 evaluated+5.53 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey78.76%89 of 113 evaluated74.01%4,032 of 5,448 evaluated+4.75 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals52.21%59 of 113 evaluated47.52%2,589 of 5,448 evaluated+4.69 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals66.37%75 of 113 evaluated63.14%3,440 of 5,448 evaluated+3.23 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data76.11%86 of 113 evaluated73.15%3,985 of 5,448 evaluated+2.96 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey49.56%56 of 113 evaluated51.71%2,817 of 5,448 evaluated−2.15 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data96.46%109 of 113 evaluated94.42%5,144 of 5,448 evaluated+2.04 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data94.69%107 of 113 evaluated92.73%5,052 of 5,448 evaluated+1.96 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals35.40%40 of 113 evaluated33.90%1,847 of 5,448 evaluated+1.50 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data92.04%104 of 113 evaluated93.12%5,073 of 5,448 evaluated−1.08 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey78.76%89 of 113 evaluated78.52%4,278 of 5,448 evaluated+0.24 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals45.13%51 of 113 evaluated45.28%2,467 of 5,448 evaluated−0.15 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals67.26%76 of 113 evaluated67.20%3,661 of 5,448 evaluated+0.06 pp

2026 Canada study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 11,797-website 2026 Canada study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Emergency-services page not detected69.35%

Clear booking action not detected56.82%

Insurance or payment page not detected78.50%

Privacy-policy link not detected67.52%

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected50.03%

AggregateRating structured data not detected94.43%

FAQ page not detected73.93%

Limited useful content43.84%

XML sitemap not detected31.14%

Missing canonical tags35.19%

Missing meta descriptions46.44%

Unclear H1 structure59.50%

Contact or inquiry form not detected62.02%

FAQPage structured data not detected93.76%

Service or treatment structured data not detected93.63%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected71.15%

Images missing alternative text69.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Richmond Hill

How good are dental practice websites in Richmond Hill?
Across 113 audited Richmond Hill dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 70 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 81 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Richmond Hill dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Richmond Hill dental websites are: “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (96% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (92% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Richmond Hill compare with the rest of Ontario?
Richmond Hill's median score of 70 is 1 point below the Ontario-wide median of 71, based on 5,448 audited websites across Ontario.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Richmond Hill in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Ontario benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Richmond Hill figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.