Skip to main content
North Dakota benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Fargo, ND

Live figures from 55 indexable audited Fargo dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

74

median score

+1.00 vs North Dakota median 73

71.75

average score

North Dakota average: 69.76

81

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

55

websites audited

of 182 across North Dakota

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Fargo

Counts use all 55 indexable audited Fargo websites.

A

1.82%

1 of 55

B

30.91%

17 of 55

C

34.55%

19 of 55

D

14.55%

8 of 55

F

18.18%

10 of 55

North Dakota distribution: A 3% · B 25% · C 32% · D 18% · F 22% (182 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Fargo dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Fargo websites are omitted.

95%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

52 of 55 evaluated Fargo websites — vs 97.25% across North Dakota.

95%

FAQPage structured data not detected

52 of 55 evaluated Fargo websites — vs 96.70% across North Dakota.

87%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

48 of 55 evaluated Fargo websites — vs 94.51% across North Dakota.

Fargo check rates compared with North Dakota rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckFargo rateNorth Dakota rateDifference
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals38.18%21 of 55 evaluated46.70%85 of 182 evaluated−8.52 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data87.27%48 of 55 evaluated94.51%172 of 182 evaluated−7.24 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey69.09%38 of 55 evaluated75.82%138 of 182 evaluated−6.73 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey43.64%24 of 55 evaluated48.90%89 of 182 evaluated−5.26 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals41.82%23 of 55 evaluated46.15%84 of 182 evaluated−4.33 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data47.27%26 of 55 evaluated51.10%93 of 182 evaluated−3.83 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey50.91%28 of 55 evaluated54.40%99 of 182 evaluated−3.49 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals36.36%20 of 55 evaluated39.56%72 of 182 evaluated−3.20 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals67.27%37 of 55 evaluated70.33%128 of 182 evaluated−3.06 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data94.55%52 of 55 evaluated97.25%177 of 182 evaluated−2.70 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals63.64%35 of 55 evaluated60.99%111 of 182 evaluated+2.65 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey70.91%39 of 55 evaluated73.08%133 of 182 evaluated−2.17 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data94.55%52 of 55 evaluated96.70%176 of 182 evaluated−2.15 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data65.45%36 of 55 evaluated67.03%122 of 182 evaluated−1.58 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey70.91%39 of 55 evaluated69.78%127 of 182 evaluated+1.13 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals32.73%18 of 55 evaluated32.97%60 of 182 evaluated−0.24 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey58.18%32 of 55 evaluated58.24%106 of 182 evaluated−0.06 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Fargo

How good are dental practice websites in Fargo?
Across 55 audited Fargo dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 74 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 81 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Fargo dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Fargo dental websites are: “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (87% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Fargo compare with the rest of North Dakota?
Fargo's median score of 74 is 1 point above the North Dakota-wide median of 73, based on 182 audited websites across North Dakota.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Fargo in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the North Dakota benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Fargo figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.