Skip to main content
North Carolina benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Wilmington, NC

Live figures from 99 indexable audited Wilmington dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

74

median score

−1.00 vs North Carolina median 75

68.64

average score

North Carolina average: 71.38

80

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

99

websites audited

of 2,701 across North Carolina

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Wilmington

Counts use all 99 indexable audited Wilmington websites.

A

2.02%

2 of 99

B

27.27%

27 of 99

C

25.25%

25 of 99

D

18.18%

18 of 99

F

27.27%

27 of 99

North Carolina distribution: A 5% · B 32% · C 28% · D 14% · F 21% (2,701 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Wilmington dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Wilmington websites are omitted.

95%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

94 of 99 evaluated Wilmington websites — vs 93.04% across North Carolina.

93%

FAQPage structured data not detected

92 of 99 evaluated Wilmington websites — vs 95.41% across North Carolina.

89%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

88 of 99 evaluated Wilmington websites — vs 91.00% across North Carolina.

Wilmington check rates compared with North Carolina rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckWilmington rateNorth Carolina rateDifference
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals46.46%46 of 99 evaluated35.84%968 of 2,701 evaluated+10.62 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals50.51%50 of 99 evaluated41.21%1,113 of 2,701 evaluated+9.30 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data52.53%52 of 99 evaluated45.32%1,224 of 2,701 evaluated+7.21 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey74.75%74 of 99 evaluated68.12%1,840 of 2,701 evaluated+6.63 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals44.44%44 of 99 evaluated39.47%1,066 of 2,701 evaluated+4.97 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey54.55%54 of 99 evaluated49.72%1,343 of 2,701 evaluated+4.83 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey67.68%67 of 99 evaluated63.57%1,717 of 2,701 evaluated+4.11 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals36.36%36 of 99 evaluated32.69%883 of 2,701 evaluated+3.67 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey72.73%72 of 99 evaluated69.86%1,887 of 2,701 evaluated+2.87 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey58.59%58 of 99 evaluated55.76%1,506 of 2,701 evaluated+2.83 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals65.66%65 of 99 evaluated68.23%1,843 of 2,701 evaluated−2.57 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data92.93%92 of 99 evaluated95.41%2,577 of 2,701 evaluated−2.48 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data88.89%88 of 99 evaluated91.00%2,458 of 2,701 evaluated−2.11 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey45.45%45 of 99 evaluated47.46%1,282 of 2,701 evaluated−2.01 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data94.95%94 of 99 evaluated93.04%2,513 of 2,701 evaluated+1.91 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals55.56%55 of 99 evaluated56.53%1,527 of 2,701 evaluated−0.97 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data66.67%66 of 99 evaluated66.98%1,809 of 2,701 evaluated−0.31 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Wilmington

How good are dental practice websites in Wilmington?
Across 99 audited Wilmington dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 74 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 80 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Wilmington dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Wilmington dental websites are: “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (93% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (89% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Wilmington compare with the rest of North Carolina?
Wilmington's median score of 74 is 1 point below the North Carolina-wide median of 75, based on 2,701 audited websites across North Carolina.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Wilmington in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the North Carolina benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Wilmington figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.