Skip to main content
All benchmarks

Dental Website SEO Benchmark: New York (2026)

Based on 2,723 audited dental websites in New York, from 4,065 attempted domains. Cohort dps-37-v1.

Browse the New York practice directory

New York practices scored a median of 74, 3 points below the national median of 77. The largest difference versus the national cohort (n=50,405) was insurance or payment page not detected: 59.05% of 2,723 New York sites, 7.65 percentage points higher than the national rate. New York's strongest other relative result was images missing alternative text, with the observed gap 1.83 percentage points below the national rate.

74

Median score

−3.00 vs national median 77

71.33

Mean score

−2.80 vs national mean 74.13

2,723

Websites checked

Nationwide: 50,405 websites checked

66.99%

Auditable rate

−3.68 pp vs national 70.67% (50,405 of 71,323); state base 2,723 of 4,065

Score distribution

Grade distribution

Percentages use all 2,723 audited New York domains as the base.

A

3.16%

86 of 2,723

B

27.40%

746 of 2,723

C

32.17%

876 of 2,723

D

19.68%

536 of 2,723

F

17.59%

479 of 2,723

Category detail

Average category scores

Each average uses the same 2,723-domain audited base. Local SEO is shown only as a labelled detail because three inputs were not evaluated in this cohort.

57.64

Website fundamentals

Average across 2,723 websites

65.99

AI visibility

Average across 2,723 websites

65.26

Patient trust

Average across 2,723 websites

96.06

Local SEO

Partial; upward-biased

Largest absolute difference first

Metric rates versus the national cohort

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in this bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage below shows its observation base.

New York metric rates compared with national rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
MetricNew York rateNational rateDifference vs national
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey59.05%1,608 of 2,72351.40%50,405 websites+7.65 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals31.29%852 of 2,72324.75%50,405 websites+6.54 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey48.48%1,320 of 2,72342.09%50,405 websites+6.39 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals38.38%1,045 of 2,72332.11%50,405 websites+6.27 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey64.49%1,756 of 2,72358.40%50,405 websites+6.09 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data44.77%1,219 of 2,72338.72%50,405 websites+6.05 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals31.95%870 of 2,72326.14%50,405 websites+5.81 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey70.55%1,921 of 2,72365.47%50,405 websites+5.08 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data68.67%1,870 of 2,72363.60%50,405 websites+5.07 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey47.15%1,284 of 2,72342.35%50,405 websites+4.80 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals38.08%1,037 of 2,72333.36%50,405 websites+4.72 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data95.67%2,605 of 2,72391.90%50,405 websites+3.77 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals57.03%1,553 of 2,72353.80%50,405 websites+3.23 pp
DNS failureCrawl accessibility13.31%541 of 4,06510.68%71,323 websites+2.63 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals72.42%1,972 of 2,72374.25%50,405 websites−1.83 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey66.91%1,822 of 2,72368.70%50,405 websites−1.79 pp
Other crawl failureCrawl accessibility5.88%239 of 4,0654.22%71,323 websites+1.66 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data92.18%2,510 of 2,72391.06%50,405 websites+1.12 pp
HTTP 403 responseCrawl accessibility7.08%288 of 4,0658.09%71,323 websites−1.01 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data96.44%2,626 of 2,72395.57%50,405 websites+0.87 pp
robots.txt restrictionCrawl accessibility4.08%166 of 4,0653.82%71,323 websites+0.26 pp
TimeoutCrawl accessibility0.52%21 of 4,0650.40%71,323 websites+0.12 pp
Other HTTP errorCrawl accessibility1.75%71 of 4,0651.73%71,323 websites+0.02 pp
Invalid responseCrawl accessibility0.39%16 of 4,0650.38%71,323 websites+0.01 pp

Largest audited city-state samples

Top New York markets in the cohort

Markets are ordered by audited-domain count. Each row gives its own base; these are descriptive cohort cuts, not city rankings.

Top ten New York city-state markets by audited-domain count
MarketAudited domainsMedian score
New York, NY56875
Brooklyn, NY21273
Rochester, NY6774
Staten Island, NY5769
Bronx, NY5571
Garden City, NY2873.50
Buffalo, NY2772
Flushing, NY2568
Forest Hills, NY2574
Bayside, NY2379

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for New York

How do New York dental practice websites score?
Across 2,723 audited New York dental websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 74 out of 100 — 3 points below the national median of 77. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks.
What do New York dental websites most often get wrong?
The most widespread gaps observed in the New York cohort are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (96% of audited sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (96% of audited sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (92% of audited sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How can I compare my dental practice website with the New York average?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

What this study measures—and what it does not

Cohort. The completed production run covered 109,408 matched practice-location candidates across 71,323 normalized domains. Website-level findings use one deterministic representative candidate for each of the 50,405 successfully crawled domains, avoiding duplicate-domain weighting.

Collection window. Public pages were crawled on 2–3 August 2026 using methodology dps-37-v1. The bounded HTTP crawler inspected robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages. Browser rendering was not used for this index run.

Scoring. The DentalPresence Score averages four deterministic category scores. Three Local SEO inputs—Google Business Profile, cross-directory NAP consistency, and service coverage—were not evaluated in this open-data backfill, so the Local SEO average is partial and upward-biased.

Detection limits. A signal not detected in three pages may exist elsewhere, be injected only after JavaScript rendering, or use markup the parser did not recognize. The high “orphan page” result was excluded from headline recommendations because a bounded crawl cannot establish sitewide orphan status reliably.

Sampling. This is a large matched open-place cohort, not a probability sample of every U.S. dental office. It should not be used to estimate national market share or infer the quality of any individual practice.

No causal claims. The study did not use rankings, traffic, conversions, clinical data, credentials, safety records, or patient outcomes. A failed check is an observable website signal, not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The state benchmark describes a cohort, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice.