Skip to main content
All benchmarks

Dental Website SEO Benchmark: New Jersey (2026)

Based on 1,683 audited dental websites in New Jersey, from 2,436 attempted domains. Cohort dps-37-v1.

Browse the New Jersey practice directory

New Jersey practices scored a median of 76, 1 point below the national median of 77. The largest difference versus the national cohort (n=50,405) was breadcrumbList structured data not detected: 70.41% of 1,683 New Jersey sites, 6.81 percentage points higher than the national rate. New Jersey's strongest other relative result was contact or inquiry form not detected, with the observed gap 3.22 percentage points below the national rate.

76

Median score

−1.00 vs national median 77

73.61

Mean score

−0.52 vs national mean 74.13

1,683

Websites checked

Nationwide: 50,405 websites checked

69.09%

Auditable rate

−1.58 pp vs national 70.67% (50,405 of 71,323); state base 1,683 of 2,436

Score distribution

Grade distribution

Percentages use all 1,683 audited New Jersey domains as the base.

A

4.04%

68 of 1,683

B

32.38%

545 of 1,683

C

33.16%

558 of 1,683

D

18.00%

303 of 1,683

F

12.42%

209 of 1,683

Category detail

Average category scores

Each average uses the same 1,683-domain audited base. Local SEO is shown only as a labelled detail because three inputs were not evaluated in this cohort.

60.86

Website fundamentals

Average across 1,683 websites

67.17

AI visibility

Average across 1,683 websites

69.06

Patient trust

Average across 1,683 websites

97.04

Local SEO

Partial; upward-biased

Largest absolute difference first

Metric rates versus the national cohort

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in this bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage below shows its observation base.

New Jersey metric rates compared with national rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
MetricNew Jersey rateNational rateDifference vs national
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data70.41%1,185 of 1,68363.60%50,405 websites+6.81 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey56.92%958 of 1,68351.40%50,405 websites+5.52 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey46.41%781 of 1,68342.09%50,405 websites+4.32 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey65.48%1,102 of 1,68368.70%50,405 websites−3.22 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data95.07%1,600 of 1,68391.90%50,405 websites+3.17 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey68.09%1,146 of 1,68365.47%50,405 websites+2.62 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey40.46%681 of 1,68342.35%50,405 websites−1.89 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals75.34%1,268 of 1,68374.25%50,405 websites+1.09 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data39.75%669 of 1,68338.72%50,405 websites+1.03 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals31.08%523 of 1,68332.11%50,405 websites−1.03 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals54.72%921 of 1,68353.80%50,405 websites+0.92 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals34.17%575 of 1,68333.36%50,405 websites+0.81 pp
HTTP 403 responseCrawl accessibility8.78%214 of 2,4368.09%71,323 websites+0.69 pp
Other crawl failureCrawl accessibility4.84%118 of 2,4364.22%71,323 websites+0.62 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals25.37%427 of 1,68324.75%50,405 websites+0.62 pp
robots.txt restrictionCrawl accessibility4.15%101 of 2,4363.82%71,323 websites+0.33 pp
Invalid responseCrawl accessibility0.70%17 of 2,4360.38%71,323 websites+0.32 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals25.85%435 of 1,68326.14%50,405 websites−0.29 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey58.65%987 of 1,68358.40%50,405 websites+0.25 pp
DNS failureCrawl accessibility10.51%256 of 2,43610.68%71,323 websites−0.17 pp
Other HTTP errorCrawl accessibility1.56%38 of 2,4361.73%71,323 websites−0.17 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data91.15%1,534 of 1,68391.06%50,405 websites+0.09 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data95.48%1,607 of 1,68395.57%50,405 websites−0.09 pp
TimeoutCrawl accessibility0.37%9 of 2,4360.40%71,323 websites−0.03 pp

Largest audited city-state samples

Top New Jersey markets in the cohort

Markets are ordered by audited-domain count. Each row gives its own base; these are descriptive cohort cuts, not city rankings.

Top ten New Jersey city-state markets by audited-domain count
MarketAudited domainsMedian score
Jersey City, NJ3177
Wayne, NJ2469.50
Fort Lee, NJ2367
Toms River, NJ2273.50
Clifton, NJ2177
West Orange, NJ2179
Cherry Hill, NJ2076
East Brunswick, NJ2081
Hackensack, NJ2079
Red Bank, NJ2077

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for New Jersey

How do New Jersey dental practice websites score?
Across 1,683 audited New Jersey dental websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 76 out of 100 — 1 point below the national median of 77. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks.
What do New Jersey dental websites most often get wrong?
The most widespread gaps observed in the New Jersey cohort are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (95% of audited sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (95% of audited sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (91% of audited sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How can I compare my dental practice website with the New Jersey average?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

What this study measures—and what it does not

Cohort. The completed production run covered 109,408 matched practice-location candidates across 71,323 normalized domains. Website-level findings use one deterministic representative candidate for each of the 50,405 successfully crawled domains, avoiding duplicate-domain weighting.

Collection window. Public pages were crawled on 2–3 August 2026 using methodology dps-37-v1. The bounded HTTP crawler inspected robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages. Browser rendering was not used for this index run.

Scoring. The DentalPresence Score averages four deterministic category scores. Three Local SEO inputs—Google Business Profile, cross-directory NAP consistency, and service coverage—were not evaluated in this open-data backfill, so the Local SEO average is partial and upward-biased.

Detection limits. A signal not detected in three pages may exist elsewhere, be injected only after JavaScript rendering, or use markup the parser did not recognize. The high “orphan page” result was excluded from headline recommendations because a bounded crawl cannot establish sitewide orphan status reliably.

Sampling. This is a large matched open-place cohort, not a probability sample of every U.S. dental office. It should not be used to estimate national market share or infer the quality of any individual practice.

No causal claims. The study did not use rankings, traffic, conversions, clinical data, credentials, safety records, or patient outcomes. A failed check is an observable website signal, not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The state benchmark describes a cohort, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice.