Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Springfield, MO
Live figures from 86 indexable audited Springfield dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 20, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.
72.50
median score
−2.50 vs Missouri median 75
69.50
average score
Missouri average: 71.31
81
top quartile
the score the best 25% of local websites clear
86
websites audited
of 1,431 across Missouri
Score distribution
Grade distribution in Springfield
Counts use all 86 indexable audited Springfield websites.
A
2.33%
2 of 86
B
26.74%
23 of 86
C
32.56%
28 of 86
D
13.95%
12 of 86
F
24.42%
21 of 86
Missouri distribution: A 3% · B 34% · C 28% · D 13% · F 21% (1,431 websites).
Largest local difference first
Where Springfield dental websites fall short
“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Springfield websites are omitted.
98%
FAQPage structured data not detected
84 of 86 evaluated Springfield websites — vs 96.58% across Missouri.
94%
AggregateRating structured data not detected
81 of 86 evaluated Springfield websites — vs 95.67% across Missouri.
92%
Service or treatment structured data not detected
79 of 86 evaluated Springfield websites — vs 90.92% across Missouri.
| Check | Springfield rate | Missouri rate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals | 77.91%67 of 86 evaluated | 68.06%974 of 1,431 evaluated | +9.85 pp |
| Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey | 72.09%62 of 86 evaluated | 63.59%910 of 1,431 evaluated | +8.50 pp |
| Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey | 58.14%50 of 86 evaluated | 51.08%731 of 1,431 evaluated | +7.06 pp |
| Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data | 50.00%43 of 86 evaluated | 43.05%616 of 1,431 evaluated | +6.95 pp |
| FAQ page not detectedPatient journey | 74.42%64 of 86 evaluated | 67.51%966 of 1,431 evaluated | +6.91 pp |
| Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals | 65.12%56 of 86 evaluated | 59.19%847 of 1,431 evaluated | +5.93 pp |
| Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals | 38.37%33 of 86 evaluated | 32.49%465 of 1,431 evaluated | +5.88 pp |
| Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey | 61.63%53 of 86 evaluated | 55.97%801 of 1,431 evaluated | +5.66 pp |
| Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey | 52.33%45 of 86 evaluated | 47.59%681 of 1,431 evaluated | +4.74 pp |
| Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals | 44.19%38 of 86 evaluated | 39.62%567 of 1,431 evaluated | +4.57 pp |
| Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey | 77.91%67 of 86 evaluated | 74.07%1,060 of 1,431 evaluated | +3.84 pp |
| BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data | 67.44%58 of 86 evaluated | 63.87%914 of 1,431 evaluated | +3.57 pp |
| Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals | 43.02%37 of 86 evaluated | 41.30%591 of 1,431 evaluated | +1.72 pp |
| AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data | 94.19%81 of 86 evaluated | 95.67%1,369 of 1,431 evaluated | −1.48 pp |
| FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data | 97.67%84 of 86 evaluated | 96.58%1,382 of 1,431 evaluated | +1.09 pp |
| Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data | 91.86%79 of 86 evaluated | 90.92%1,301 of 1,431 evaluated | +0.94 pp |
| XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals | 33.72%29 of 86 evaluated | 33.61%481 of 1,431 evaluated | +0.11 pp |
2026 US study baseline
The frozen national picture for the same checks
Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%
Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%
Clear booking action not detected42.35%
Missing meta descriptions33.36%
Emergency-services page not detected58.40%
FAQ page not detected65.47%
Unclear H1 structure53.80%
Missing canonical tags26.14%
Limited useful content32.11%
Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%
FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%
Images missing alternative text74.25%
XML sitemap not detected24.75%
BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%
AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%
Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%
Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%
Explore the Springfield market
Common questions
Dental SEO and website questions for Springfield
- How good are dental practice websites in Springfield?
- Across 86 audited Springfield dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 72.50 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 81 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
- What do Springfield dental websites most often get wrong?
- The most common gaps detected on audited Springfield dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (98% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (94% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (92% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
- How does dental website quality in Springfield compare with the rest of Missouri?
- Springfield's median score of 72.50 is 2.5 points below the Missouri-wide median of 75, based on 1,431 audited websites across Missouri.
- How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
- Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.
Methodology and limitations
How these live figures are computed
Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Springfield in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.
Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.
What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Missouri benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.
No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.
Use the benchmark
Score a dental website against the same framework
The Springfield figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.