Skip to main content
Massachusetts benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Brookline, MA

Live figures from 62 indexable audited Brookline dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 2, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

74.50

median score

+0.50 vs Massachusetts median 74

72.06

average score

Massachusetts average: 70.99

85

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

62

websites audited

of 2,380 across Massachusetts

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Brookline

Counts use all 62 indexable audited Brookline websites.

A

6.45%

4 of 62

B

32.26%

20 of 62

C

20.97%

13 of 62

D

19.35%

12 of 62

F

20.97%

13 of 62

Massachusetts distribution: A 4% · B 31% · C 28% · D 15% · F 21% (2,380 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Brookline dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Brookline websites are omitted.

92%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

57 of 62 evaluated Brookline websites — vs 94.24% across Massachusetts.

90%

FAQPage structured data not detected

56 of 62 evaluated Brookline websites — vs 95.46% across Massachusetts.

85%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

53 of 62 evaluated Brookline websites — vs 93.36% across Massachusetts.

Brookline check rates compared with Massachusetts rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckBrookline rateMassachusetts rateDifference
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data85.48%53 of 62 evaluated93.36%2,222 of 2,380 evaluated−7.88 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals74.19%46 of 62 evaluated67.52%1,607 of 2,380 evaluated+6.67 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals33.87%21 of 62 evaluated39.50%940 of 2,380 evaluated−5.63 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data90.32%56 of 62 evaluated95.46%2,272 of 2,380 evaluated−5.14 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data67.74%42 of 62 evaluated72.44%1,724 of 2,380 evaluated−4.70 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey54.84%34 of 62 evaluated59.16%1,408 of 2,380 evaluated−4.32 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey59.68%37 of 62 evaluated63.74%1,517 of 2,380 evaluated−4.06 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey72.58%45 of 62 evaluated68.66%1,634 of 2,380 evaluated+3.92 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals61.29%38 of 62 evaluated57.61%1,371 of 2,380 evaluated+3.68 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals43.55%27 of 62 evaluated40.46%963 of 2,380 evaluated+3.09 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data91.94%57 of 62 evaluated94.24%2,243 of 2,380 evaluated−2.30 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data45.16%28 of 62 evaluated47.35%1,127 of 2,380 evaluated−2.19 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey45.16%28 of 62 evaluated47.18%1,123 of 2,380 evaluated−2.02 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey51.61%32 of 62 evaluated49.71%1,183 of 2,380 evaluated+1.90 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals33.87%21 of 62 evaluated32.23%767 of 2,380 evaluated+1.64 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals33.87%21 of 62 evaluated34.75%827 of 2,380 evaluated−0.88 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey66.13%41 of 62 evaluated65.80%1,566 of 2,380 evaluated+0.33 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Brookline

How good are dental practice websites in Brookline?
Across 62 audited Brookline dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 74.50 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 85 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Brookline dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Brookline dental websites are: “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (92% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (90% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (85% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Brookline compare with the rest of Massachusetts?
Brookline's median score of 74.50 is 0.5 points above the Massachusetts-wide median of 74, based on 2,380 audited websites across Massachusetts.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Brookline in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Massachusetts benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Brookline figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.