Dental Website SEO Benchmark: Manitoba (2026)
Based on 275 audited dental websites in Manitoba, from 394 attempted domains. Cohort dps-37-v1.
Browse the Manitoba practice directoryManitoba practices scored a median of 71, matching the national median of 71. The largest difference versus the national cohort (n=11,820) was xML sitemap not detected: 23.27% of 275 Manitoba sites, 7.87 percentage points lower than the national rate. Manitoba's strongest other relative result was clear booking action not detected, with the observed gap 7.00 percentage points below the national rate.
71
Median score
0 vs national median 71
70.39
Mean score
+1.58 vs national mean 68.81
275
Websites checked
Nationwide: 11,820 websites checked
69.80%
Auditable rate
−2.69 pp vs national 72.49% (11,820 of 16,306); state base 275 of 394
Score distribution
Grade distribution
Percentages use all 275 audited Manitoba domains as the base.
A
3.64%
10 of 275
B
25.45%
70 of 275
C
25.82%
71 of 275
D
27.27%
75 of 275
F
17.82%
49 of 275
Category detail
Average category scores
Each average uses the same 275-domain audited base. Local SEO is shown only as a labelled detail because three inputs were not evaluated in this cohort.
60.61
Website fundamentals
Average across 275 websites
63.80
AI visibility
Average across 275 websites
60.26
Patient trust
Average across 275 websites
96.53
Local SEO
Partial; upward-biased
Largest absolute difference first
Metric rates versus the national cohort
“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in this bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage below shows its observation base.
| Metric | Manitoba rate | National rate | Difference vs national |
|---|---|---|---|
| XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals | 23.27%64 of 275 | 31.14%11,797 websites | −7.87 pp |
| BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data | 78.18%215 of 275 | 71.15%11,797 websites | +7.03 pp |
| Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey | 49.82%137 of 275 | 56.82%11,797 websites | −7.00 pp |
| Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey | 60.73%167 of 275 | 67.52%11,797 websites | −6.79 pp |
| Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey | 72.36%199 of 275 | 78.50%11,797 websites | −6.14 pp |
| Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals | 41.45%114 of 275 | 46.44%11,797 websites | −4.99 pp |
| DNS failureCrawl accessibility | 20.81%82 of 394 | 16.49%16,279 websites | +4.32 pp |
| Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals | 55.27%152 of 275 | 59.50%11,797 websites | −4.23 pp |
| FAQ page not detectedPatient journey | 70.55%194 of 275 | 73.93%11,797 websites | −3.38 pp |
| FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data | 97.09%267 of 275 | 93.76%11,797 websites | +3.33 pp |
| Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data | 96.36%265 of 275 | 93.63%11,797 websites | +2.73 pp |
| Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey | 64.73%178 of 275 | 62.02%11,797 websites | +2.71 pp |
| Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data | 52.73%145 of 275 | 50.03%11,797 websites | +2.70 pp |
| Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals | 41.45%114 of 275 | 43.84%11,797 websites | −2.39 pp |
| Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals | 33.45%92 of 275 | 35.19%11,797 websites | −1.74 pp |
| Other crawl failureCrawl accessibility | 2.79%11 of 394 | 3.93%16,279 websites | −1.14 pp |
| HTTP 403 responseCrawl accessibility | 1.52%6 of 394 | 2.50%16,279 websites | −0.98 pp |
| Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey | 68.73%189 of 275 | 69.35%11,797 websites | −0.62 pp |
| robots.txt restrictionCrawl accessibility | 2.79%11 of 394 | 2.24%16,279 websites | +0.55 pp |
| AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data | 94.91%261 of 275 | 94.43%11,797 websites | +0.48 pp |
| Other HTTP errorCrawl accessibility | 1.78%7 of 394 | 2.10%16,279 websites | −0.32 pp |
| Invalid responseCrawl accessibility | 0.25%1 of 394 | 0.11%16,279 websites | +0.14 pp |
| TimeoutCrawl accessibility | 0.25%1 of 394 | 0.17%16,279 websites | +0.08 pp |
| Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals | 69.09%190 of 275 | 69.09%11,797 websites | 0 pp |
Largest audited city-state samples
Top Manitoba markets in the cohort
Markets are ordered by audited-domain count. Each row gives its own base; these are descriptive cohort cuts, not city rankings.
| Market | Audited domains | Median score |
|---|---|---|
| Winnipeg, MB | 213 | 72 |
| Brandon, MB | 17 | 71 |
| Selkirk, MB | 6 | 72.50 |
| Beausejour, MB | 4 | 74.50 |
| Steinbach, MB | 4 | 58.50 |
| Niverville, MB | 3 | 68 |
| The Pas, MB | 3 | 64 |
| Winkler, MB | 3 | 66 |
| Flin Flon, MB | 2 | 67.50 |
| Morden, MB | 2 | 69 |
Common questions
Dental SEO and website questions for Manitoba
- How do Manitoba dental practice websites score?
- Across 275 audited Manitoba dental websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 71 out of 100 — equal to the national median of 71. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks.
- What do Manitoba dental websites most often get wrong?
- The most widespread gaps observed in the Manitoba cohort are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (97% of audited sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (96% of audited sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (95% of audited sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
- How can I compare my dental practice website with the Manitoba average?
- Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.
Methodology and limitations
What this study measures—and what it does not
Cohort. The completed production run attempted 16,306 normalized Canada practice domains and successfully audited 11,820 of them. Website-level findings use one deterministic representative candidate per domain, avoiding duplicate-domain weighting.
Collection window. Public pages were crawled on 23–24 August 2026 using methodology dps-37-v1. The bounded HTTP crawler inspected robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages. Browser rendering was not used for this index run.
Scoring. The DentalPresence Score averages four deterministic category scores. Three Local SEO inputs—Google Business Profile, cross-directory NAP consistency, and service coverage—were not evaluated in this open-data backfill, so the Local SEO average is partial and upward-biased.
Detection limits. A signal not detected in three pages may exist elsewhere, be injected only after JavaScript rendering, or use markup the parser did not recognize. The high “orphan page” result was excluded from headline recommendations because a bounded crawl cannot establish sitewide orphan status reliably.
Sampling. This is a large matched open-place cohort, not a probability sample of every Canada dental practice. It should not be used to estimate national market share or infer the quality of any individual practice.
No causal claims. The study did not use rankings, traffic, conversions, clinical data, credentials, safety records, or patient outcomes. A failed check is an observable website signal, not proof of lost revenue or poor care.
Use the benchmark
Score a dental website against the same framework
The state benchmark describes a cohort, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice.