Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Topeka, KS
Live figures from 55 indexable audited Topeka dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 20, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.
73
median score
−1.00 vs Kansas median 74
69.51
average score
Kansas average: 70.98
82.50
top quartile
the score the best 25% of local websites clear
55
websites audited
of 785 across Kansas
Score distribution
Grade distribution in Topeka
Counts use all 55 indexable audited Topeka websites.
A
1.82%
1 of 55
B
41.82%
23 of 55
C
14.55%
8 of 55
D
14.55%
8 of 55
F
27.27%
15 of 55
Kansas distribution: A 3% · B 30% · C 29% · D 18% · F 20% (785 websites).
Largest local difference first
Where Topeka dental websites fall short
“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Topeka websites are omitted.
100%
Service or treatment structured data not detected
55 of 55 evaluated Topeka websites — vs 95.92% across Kansas.
100%
FAQPage structured data not detected
55 of 55 evaluated Topeka websites — vs 96.82% across Kansas.
98%
AggregateRating structured data not detected
54 of 55 evaluated Topeka websites — vs 94.78% across Kansas.
| Check | Topeka rate | Kansas rate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAQ page not detectedPatient journey | 52.73%29 of 55 evaluated | 66.24%520 of 785 evaluated | −13.51 pp |
| BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data | 80.00%44 of 55 evaluated | 69.17%543 of 785 evaluated | +10.83 pp |
| Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals | 41.82%23 of 55 evaluated | 32.61%256 of 785 evaluated | +9.21 pp |
| Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey | 74.55%41 of 55 evaluated | 68.54%538 of 785 evaluated | +6.01 pp |
| Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey | 45.45%25 of 55 evaluated | 50.96%400 of 785 evaluated | −5.51 pp |
| XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals | 34.55%19 of 55 evaluated | 29.43%231 of 785 evaluated | +5.12 pp |
| Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals | 72.73%40 of 55 evaluated | 68.28%536 of 785 evaluated | +4.45 pp |
| Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey | 78.18%43 of 55 evaluated | 73.76%579 of 785 evaluated | +4.42 pp |
| Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data | 100.00%55 of 55 evaluated | 95.92%753 of 785 evaluated | +4.08 pp |
| AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data | 98.18%54 of 55 evaluated | 94.78%744 of 785 evaluated | +3.40 pp |
| FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data | 100.00%55 of 55 evaluated | 96.82%760 of 785 evaluated | +3.18 pp |
| Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals | 54.55%30 of 55 evaluated | 57.07%448 of 785 evaluated | −2.52 pp |
| Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals | 38.18%21 of 55 evaluated | 40.25%316 of 785 evaluated | −2.07 pp |
| Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data | 50.91%28 of 55 evaluated | 49.04%385 of 785 evaluated | +1.87 pp |
| Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey | 54.55%30 of 55 evaluated | 52.87%415 of 785 evaluated | +1.68 pp |
| Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey | 50.91%28 of 55 evaluated | 51.97%408 of 785 evaluated | −1.06 pp |
| Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals | 43.64%24 of 55 evaluated | 42.93%337 of 785 evaluated | +0.71 pp |
2026 US study baseline
The frozen national picture for the same checks
Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%
Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%
Clear booking action not detected42.35%
Missing meta descriptions33.36%
Emergency-services page not detected58.40%
FAQ page not detected65.47%
Unclear H1 structure53.80%
Missing canonical tags26.14%
Limited useful content32.11%
Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%
FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%
Images missing alternative text74.25%
XML sitemap not detected24.75%
BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%
AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%
Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%
Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%
Explore the Topeka market
Common questions
Dental SEO and website questions for Topeka
- How good are dental practice websites in Topeka?
- Across 55 audited Topeka dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 73 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 82.50 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
- What do Topeka dental websites most often get wrong?
- The most common gaps detected on audited Topeka dental websites are: “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (98% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
- How does dental website quality in Topeka compare with the rest of Kansas?
- Topeka's median score of 73 is 1 point below the Kansas-wide median of 74, based on 785 audited websites across Kansas.
- How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
- Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.
Methodology and limitations
How these live figures are computed
Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Topeka in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.
Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.
What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Kansas benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.
No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.
Use the benchmark
Score a dental website against the same framework
The Topeka figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.