Skip to main content
All benchmarks

Dental Website SEO Benchmark: Indiana (2026)

Based on 922 audited dental websites in Indiana, from 1,337 attempted domains. Cohort dps-37-v1.

Browse the Indiana practice directory

Indiana practices scored a median of 76, 1 point below the national median of 77. The largest difference versus the national cohort (n=50,405) was insurance or payment page not detected: 46.64% of 922 Indiana sites, 4.76 percentage points lower than the national rate. Indiana's strongest other relative result was service or treatment structured data not detected, with the observed gap 3.29 percentage points below the national rate.

76

Median score

−1.00 vs national median 77

73.84

Mean score

−0.29 vs national mean 74.13

922

Websites checked

Nationwide: 50,405 websites checked

68.96%

Auditable rate

−1.71 pp vs national 70.67% (50,405 of 71,323); state base 922 of 1,337

Score distribution

Grade distribution

Percentages use all 922 audited Indiana domains as the base.

A

5.42%

50 of 922

B

35.57%

328 of 922

C

27.33%

252 of 922

D

18.98%

175 of 922

F

12.69%

117 of 922

Category detail

Average category scores

Each average uses the same 922-domain audited base. Local SEO is shown only as a labelled detail because three inputs were not evaluated in this cohort.

60.24

Website fundamentals

Average across 922 websites

67.74

AI visibility

Average across 922 websites

69.90

Patient trust

Average across 922 websites

97.17

Local SEO

Partial; upward-biased

Largest absolute difference first

Metric rates versus the national cohort

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in this bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage below shows its observation base.

Indiana metric rates compared with national rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
MetricIndiana rateNational rateDifference vs national
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey46.64%430 of 92251.40%50,405 websites−4.76 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey46.10%425 of 92242.35%50,405 websites+3.75 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data88.61%817 of 92291.90%50,405 websites−3.29 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey71.58%660 of 92268.70%50,405 websites+2.88 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data93.82%865 of 92291.06%50,405 websites+2.76 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals27.22%251 of 92224.75%50,405 websites+2.47 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data41.00%378 of 92238.72%50,405 websites+2.28 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals51.95%479 of 92253.80%50,405 websites−1.85 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals27.87%257 of 92226.14%50,405 websites+1.73 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals75.92%700 of 92274.25%50,405 websites+1.67 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals34.82%321 of 92233.36%50,405 websites+1.46 pp
robots.txt restrictionCrawl accessibility5.24%70 of 1,3373.82%71,323 websites+1.42 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals33.41%308 of 92232.11%50,405 websites+1.30 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey40.89%377 of 92242.09%50,405 websites−1.20 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data62.58%577 of 92263.60%50,405 websites−1.02 pp
DNS failureCrawl accessibility9.87%132 of 1,33710.68%71,323 websites−0.81 pp
HTTP 403 responseCrawl accessibility8.60%115 of 1,3378.09%71,323 websites+0.51 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data95.12%877 of 92295.57%50,405 websites−0.45 pp
Other HTTP errorCrawl accessibility2.17%29 of 1,3371.73%71,323 websites+0.44 pp
Other crawl failureCrawl accessibility4.56%61 of 1,3374.22%71,323 websites+0.34 pp
Invalid responseCrawl accessibility0.22%3 of 1,3370.38%71,323 websites−0.16 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey58.35%538 of 92258.40%50,405 websites−0.05 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey65.51%604 of 92265.47%50,405 websites+0.04 pp
TimeoutCrawl accessibility0.37%5 of 1,3370.40%71,323 websites−0.03 pp

Largest audited city-state samples

Top Indiana markets in the cohort

Markets are ordered by audited-domain count. Each row gives its own base; these are descriptive cohort cuts, not city rankings.

Top ten Indiana city-state markets by audited-domain count
MarketAudited domainsMedian score
Indianapolis, IN14676
Fort Wayne, IN3878.50
Carmel, IN3280.50
Fishers, IN2479
Evansville, IN2275.50
Greenwood, IN2283.50
Bloomington, IN1983
Crown Point, IN1983
Noblesville, IN1977
Lafayette, IN1873.50

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Indiana

How do Indiana dental practice websites score?
Across 922 audited Indiana dental websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 76 out of 100 — 1 point below the national median of 77. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks.
What do Indiana dental websites most often get wrong?
The most widespread gaps observed in the Indiana cohort are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (95% of audited sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (94% of audited sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (89% of audited sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How can I compare my dental practice website with the Indiana average?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

What this study measures—and what it does not

Cohort. The completed production run covered 109,408 matched practice-location candidates across 71,323 normalized domains. Website-level findings use one deterministic representative candidate for each of the 50,405 successfully crawled domains, avoiding duplicate-domain weighting.

Collection window. Public pages were crawled on 2–3 August 2026 using methodology dps-37-v1. The bounded HTTP crawler inspected robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages. Browser rendering was not used for this index run.

Scoring. The DentalPresence Score averages four deterministic category scores. Three Local SEO inputs—Google Business Profile, cross-directory NAP consistency, and service coverage—were not evaluated in this open-data backfill, so the Local SEO average is partial and upward-biased.

Detection limits. A signal not detected in three pages may exist elsewhere, be injected only after JavaScript rendering, or use markup the parser did not recognize. The high “orphan page” result was excluded from headline recommendations because a bounded crawl cannot establish sitewide orphan status reliably.

Sampling. This is a large matched open-place cohort, not a probability sample of every U.S. dental office. It should not be used to estimate national market share or infer the quality of any individual practice.

No causal claims. The study did not use rankings, traffic, conversions, clinical data, credentials, safety records, or patient outcomes. A failed check is an observable website signal, not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The state benchmark describes a cohort, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice.