Skip to main content
Illinois benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Naperville, IL

Live figures from 119 indexable audited Naperville dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

76

median score

+3.00 vs Illinois median 73

73.33

average score

Illinois average: 70.73

85

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

119

websites audited

of 3,974 across Illinois

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Naperville

Counts use all 119 indexable audited Naperville websites.

A

5.88%

7 of 119

B

32.77%

39 of 119

C

31.93%

38 of 119

D

11.76%

14 of 119

F

17.65%

21 of 119

Illinois distribution: A 5% · B 29% · C 28% · D 16% · F 22% (3,974 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Naperville dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Naperville websites are omitted.

95%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

113 of 119 evaluated Naperville websites — vs 93.41% across Illinois.

94%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

112 of 119 evaluated Naperville websites — vs 92.53% across Illinois.

92%

FAQPage structured data not detected

110 of 119 evaluated Naperville websites — vs 95.47% across Illinois.

Naperville check rates compared with Illinois rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckNaperville rateIllinois rateDifference
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey61.34%73 of 119 evaluated71.72%2,850 of 3,974 evaluated−10.38 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey38.66%46 of 119 evaluated48.87%1,942 of 3,974 evaluated−10.21 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey47.90%57 of 119 evaluated57.70%2,293 of 3,974 evaluated−9.80 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals34.45%41 of 119 evaluated42.02%1,670 of 3,974 evaluated−7.57 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals35.29%42 of 119 evaluated41.70%1,657 of 3,974 evaluated−6.41 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data42.02%50 of 119 evaluated47.36%1,882 of 3,974 evaluated−5.34 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data92.44%110 of 119 evaluated95.47%3,794 of 3,974 evaluated−3.03 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals64.71%77 of 119 evaluated67.19%2,670 of 3,974 evaluated−2.48 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals34.45%41 of 119 evaluated36.26%1,441 of 3,974 evaluated−1.81 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals39.50%47 of 119 evaluated37.75%1,500 of 3,974 evaluated+1.75 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals57.98%69 of 119 evaluated56.34%2,239 of 3,974 evaluated+1.64 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data94.12%112 of 119 evaluated92.53%3,677 of 3,974 evaluated+1.59 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data94.96%113 of 119 evaluated93.41%3,712 of 3,974 evaluated+1.55 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data70.59%84 of 119 evaluated69.30%2,754 of 3,974 evaluated+1.29 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey65.55%78 of 119 evaluated64.47%2,562 of 3,974 evaluated+1.08 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey47.90%57 of 119 evaluated48.74%1,937 of 3,974 evaluated−0.84 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey68.91%82 of 119 evaluated69.73%2,771 of 3,974 evaluated−0.82 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Naperville

How good are dental practice websites in Naperville?
Across 119 audited Naperville dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 76 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 85 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Naperville dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Naperville dental websites are: “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (94% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (92% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Naperville compare with the rest of Illinois?
Naperville's median score of 76 is 3 points above the Illinois-wide median of 73, based on 3,974 audited websites across Illinois.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Naperville in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Illinois benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Naperville figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.