Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Venice, FL
Live figures from 40 indexable audited Venice dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit August 30, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.
77.50
median score
+1.50 vs Florida median 76
75.88
average score
Florida average: 71.97
84.50
top quartile
the score the best 25% of local websites clear
40
websites audited
of 6,536 across Florida
Score distribution
Grade distribution in Venice
Counts use all 40 indexable audited Venice websites.
A
15.00%
6 of 40
B
25.00%
10 of 40
C
42.50%
17 of 40
D
7.50%
3 of 40
F
10.00%
4 of 40
Florida distribution: A 7% · B 34% · C 25% · D 13% · F 21% (6,536 websites).
Largest local difference first
Where Venice dental websites fall short
“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Venice websites are omitted.
100%
AggregateRating structured data not detected
40 of 40 evaluated Venice websites — vs 91.10% across Florida.
98%
FAQPage structured data not detected
39 of 40 evaluated Venice websites — vs 94.00% across Florida.
85%
Service or treatment structured data not detected
34 of 40 evaluated Venice websites — vs 86.77% across Florida.
| Check | Venice rate | Florida rate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals | 25.00%10 of 40 evaluated | 39.44%2,578 of 6,536 evaluated | −14.44 pp |
| Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data | 30.00%12 of 40 evaluated | 43.24%2,826 of 6,536 evaluated | −13.24 pp |
| XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals | 20.00%8 of 40 evaluated | 32.65%2,134 of 6,536 evaluated | −12.65 pp |
| Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals | 80.00%32 of 40 evaluated | 68.42%4,472 of 6,536 evaluated | +11.58 pp |
| Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals | 30.00%12 of 40 evaluated | 40.38%2,639 of 6,536 evaluated | −10.38 pp |
| Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey | 55.00%22 of 40 evaluated | 44.97%2,939 of 6,536 evaluated | +10.03 pp |
| Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey | 45.00%18 of 40 evaluated | 54.85%3,585 of 6,536 evaluated | −9.85 pp |
| AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data | 100.00%40 of 40 evaluated | 91.10%5,954 of 6,536 evaluated | +8.90 pp |
| Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals | 25.00%10 of 40 evaluated | 33.29%2,176 of 6,536 evaluated | −8.29 pp |
| FAQ page not detectedPatient journey | 60.00%24 of 40 evaluated | 65.71%4,295 of 6,536 evaluated | −5.71 pp |
| Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals | 52.50%21 of 40 evaluated | 57.96%3,788 of 6,536 evaluated | −5.46 pp |
| Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey | 42.50%17 of 40 evaluated | 46.99%3,071 of 6,536 evaluated | −4.49 pp |
| FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data | 97.50%39 of 40 evaluated | 94.00%6,144 of 6,536 evaluated | +3.50 pp |
| BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data | 60.00%24 of 40 evaluated | 63.37%4,142 of 6,536 evaluated | −3.37 pp |
| Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey | 72.50%29 of 40 evaluated | 70.03%4,577 of 6,536 evaluated | +2.47 pp |
| Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey | 57.50%23 of 40 evaluated | 59.44%3,885 of 6,536 evaluated | −1.94 pp |
| Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data | 85.00%34 of 40 evaluated | 86.77%5,671 of 6,536 evaluated | −1.77 pp |
2026 US study baseline
The frozen national picture for the same checks
Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%
Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%
Clear booking action not detected42.35%
Missing meta descriptions33.36%
Emergency-services page not detected58.40%
FAQ page not detected65.47%
Unclear H1 structure53.80%
Missing canonical tags26.14%
Limited useful content32.11%
Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%
FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%
Images missing alternative text74.25%
XML sitemap not detected24.75%
BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%
AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%
Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%
Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%
Explore the Venice market
Common questions
Dental SEO and website questions for Venice
- How good are dental practice websites in Venice?
- Across 40 audited Venice dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 77.50 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 84.50 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
- What do Venice dental websites most often get wrong?
- The most common gaps detected on audited Venice dental websites are: “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “FAQPage structured data not detected” (98% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (85% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
- How does dental website quality in Venice compare with the rest of Florida?
- Venice's median score of 77.50 is 1.5 points above the Florida-wide median of 76, based on 6,536 audited websites across Florida.
- How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
- Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.
Methodology and limitations
How these live figures are computed
Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Venice in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.
Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.
What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Florida benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.
No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.
Use the benchmark
Score a dental website against the same framework
The Venice figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.