Skip to main content
Florida benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Jacksonville, FL

Live figures from 222 indexable audited Jacksonville dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

77

median score

+1.00 vs Florida median 76

71.59

average score

Florida average: 71.97

85

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

222

websites audited

of 6,535 across Florida

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Jacksonville

Counts use all 222 indexable audited Jacksonville websites.

A

7.66%

17 of 222

B

35.14%

78 of 222

C

21.62%

48 of 222

D

13.06%

29 of 222

F

22.52%

50 of 222

Florida distribution: A 7% · B 34% · C 25% · D 13% · F 21% (6,535 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Jacksonville dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Jacksonville websites are omitted.

95%

FAQPage structured data not detected

211 of 222 evaluated Jacksonville websites — vs 94.00% across Florida.

87%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

193 of 222 evaluated Jacksonville websites — vs 91.09% across Florida.

84%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

186 of 222 evaluated Jacksonville websites — vs 86.76% across Florida.

Jacksonville check rates compared with Florida rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckJacksonville rateFlorida rateDifference
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey47.30%105 of 222 evaluated54.86%3,585 of 6,535 evaluated−7.56 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals40.09%89 of 222 evaluated32.64%2,133 of 6,535 evaluated+7.45 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey40.09%89 of 222 evaluated44.97%2,939 of 6,535 evaluated−4.88 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals45.05%100 of 222 evaluated40.38%2,639 of 6,535 evaluated+4.67 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals53.60%119 of 222 evaluated57.95%3,787 of 6,535 evaluated−4.35 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data86.94%193 of 222 evaluated91.09%5,953 of 6,535 evaluated−4.15 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey73.87%164 of 222 evaluated70.02%4,576 of 6,535 evaluated+3.85 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey62.61%139 of 222 evaluated65.71%4,294 of 6,535 evaluated−3.10 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data60.36%134 of 222 evaluated63.37%4,141 of 6,535 evaluated−3.01 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data83.78%186 of 222 evaluated86.76%5,670 of 6,535 evaluated−2.98 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals70.72%157 of 222 evaluated68.42%4,471 of 6,535 evaluated+2.30 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey48.20%107 of 222 evaluated46.99%3,071 of 6,535 evaluated+1.21 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals40.54%90 of 222 evaluated39.45%2,578 of 6,535 evaluated+1.09 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data95.05%211 of 222 evaluated94.00%6,143 of 6,535 evaluated+1.05 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals34.23%76 of 222 evaluated33.30%2,176 of 6,535 evaluated+0.93 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey59.46%132 of 222 evaluated59.43%3,884 of 6,535 evaluated+0.03 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data43.24%96 of 222 evaluated43.24%2,826 of 6,535 evaluated0 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Jacksonville

How good are dental practice websites in Jacksonville?
Across 222 audited Jacksonville dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 77 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 85 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Jacksonville dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Jacksonville dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (87% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (84% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Jacksonville compare with the rest of Florida?
Jacksonville's median score of 77 is 1 point above the Florida-wide median of 76, based on 6,535 audited websites across Florida.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Jacksonville in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Florida benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Jacksonville figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.