Skip to main content
Delaware benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Newark, DE

Live figures from 37 indexable audited Newark dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

79

median score

+5.00 vs Delaware median 74

74

average score

Delaware average: 72.88

84

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

37

websites audited

of 211 across Delaware

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Newark

Counts use all 37 indexable audited Newark websites.

A

0.00%

0 of 37

B

48.65%

18 of 37

C

21.62%

8 of 37

D

13.51%

5 of 37

F

16.22%

6 of 37

Delaware distribution: A 6% · B 29% · C 33% · D 18% · F 14% (211 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Newark dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Newark websites are omitted.

95%

FAQPage structured data not detected

35 of 37 evaluated Newark websites — vs 97.63% across Delaware.

95%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

35 of 37 evaluated Newark websites — vs 96.68% across Delaware.

92%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

34 of 37 evaluated Newark websites — vs 96.21% across Delaware.

Newark check rates compared with Delaware rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckNewark rateDelaware rateDifference
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals40.54%15 of 37 evaluated32.23%68 of 211 evaluated+8.31 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data43.24%16 of 37 evaluated51.18%108 of 211 evaluated−7.94 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey59.46%22 of 37 evaluated67.30%142 of 211 evaluated−7.84 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals18.92%7 of 37 evaluated25.59%54 of 211 evaluated−6.67 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey37.84%14 of 37 evaluated43.60%92 of 211 evaluated−5.76 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey59.46%22 of 37 evaluated64.45%136 of 211 evaluated−4.99 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data62.16%23 of 37 evaluated66.82%141 of 211 evaluated−4.66 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data91.89%34 of 37 evaluated96.21%203 of 211 evaluated−4.32 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey67.57%25 of 37 evaluated63.51%134 of 211 evaluated+4.06 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals70.27%26 of 37 evaluated73.46%155 of 211 evaluated−3.19 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data94.59%35 of 37 evaluated97.63%206 of 211 evaluated−3.04 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals51.35%19 of 37 evaluated48.34%102 of 211 evaluated+3.01 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data94.59%35 of 37 evaluated96.68%204 of 211 evaluated−2.09 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey51.35%19 of 37 evaluated49.29%104 of 211 evaluated+2.06 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey48.65%18 of 37 evaluated48.34%102 of 211 evaluated+0.31 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals29.73%11 of 37 evaluated29.86%63 of 211 evaluated−0.13 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals35.14%13 of 37 evaluated35.07%74 of 211 evaluated+0.07 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Newark

How good are dental practice websites in Newark?
Across 37 audited Newark dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 79 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 84 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Newark dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Newark dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (95% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (92% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Newark compare with the rest of Delaware?
Newark's median score of 79 is 5 points above the Delaware-wide median of 74, based on 211 audited websites across Delaware.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Newark in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Delaware benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Newark figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.