Skip to main content
Colorado benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Highlands Ranch, CO

Live figures from 30 indexable audited Highlands Ranch dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit August 30, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

81.50

median score

+5.50 vs Colorado median 76

77.23

average score

Colorado average: 71.78

87

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

30

websites audited

of 2,160 across Colorado

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Highlands Ranch

Counts use all 30 indexable audited Highlands Ranch websites.

A

13.33%

4 of 30

B

43.33%

13 of 30

C

20.00%

6 of 30

D

10.00%

3 of 30

F

13.33%

4 of 30

Colorado distribution: A 6% · B 36% · C 24% · D 12% · F 22% (2,160 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Highlands Ranch dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Highlands Ranch websites are omitted.

100%

FAQPage structured data not detected

30 of 30 evaluated Highlands Ranch websites — vs 95.60% across Colorado.

90%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

27 of 30 evaluated Highlands Ranch websites — vs 91.57% across Colorado.

90%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

27 of 30 evaluated Highlands Ranch websites — vs 90.32% across Colorado.

Highlands Ranch check rates compared with Colorado rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckHighlands Ranch rateColorado rateDifference
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data40.00%12 of 30 evaluated64.26%1,388 of 2,160 evaluated−24.26 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals20.00%6 of 30 evaluated38.94%841 of 2,160 evaluated−18.94 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey30.00%9 of 30 evaluated48.56%1,049 of 2,160 evaluated−18.56 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey33.33%10 of 30 evaluated51.34%1,109 of 2,160 evaluated−18.01 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data26.67%8 of 30 evaluated42.50%918 of 2,160 evaluated−15.83 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey46.67%14 of 30 evaluated61.44%1,327 of 2,160 evaluated−14.77 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals26.67%8 of 30 evaluated39.03%843 of 2,160 evaluated−12.36 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey63.33%19 of 30 evaluated72.41%1,564 of 2,160 evaluated−9.08 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey36.67%11 of 30 evaluated44.77%967 of 2,160 evaluated−8.10 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals26.67%8 of 30 evaluated34.26%740 of 2,160 evaluated−7.59 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals26.67%8 of 30 evaluated34.26%740 of 2,160 evaluated−7.59 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data100.00%30 of 30 evaluated95.60%2,065 of 2,160 evaluated+4.40 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data90.00%27 of 30 evaluated91.57%1,978 of 2,160 evaluated−1.57 pp
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals63.33%19 of 30 evaluated64.68%1,397 of 2,160 evaluated−1.35 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey66.67%20 of 30 evaluated65.97%1,425 of 2,160 evaluated+0.70 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data90.00%27 of 30 evaluated90.32%1,951 of 2,160 evaluated−0.32 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals56.67%17 of 30 evaluated56.99%1,231 of 2,160 evaluated−0.32 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Highlands Ranch

How good are dental practice websites in Highlands Ranch?
Across 30 audited Highlands Ranch dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 81.50 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 87 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Highlands Ranch dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Highlands Ranch dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (90% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (90% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Highlands Ranch compare with the rest of Colorado?
Highlands Ranch's median score of 81.50 is 5.5 points above the Colorado-wide median of 76, based on 2,160 audited websites across Colorado.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Highlands Ranch in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Colorado benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Highlands Ranch figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.