Skip to main content
California benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Los Alamitos, CA

Live figures from 40 indexable audited Los Alamitos dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 19, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

73

median score

0 vs California median 73

70.40

average score

California average: 69.61

79

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

40

websites audited

of 14,083 across California

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Los Alamitos

Counts use all 40 indexable audited Los Alamitos websites.

A

0.00%

0 of 40

B

22.50%

9 of 40

C

42.50%

17 of 40

D

12.50%

5 of 40

F

22.50%

9 of 40

California distribution: A 4% · B 28% · C 27% · D 16% · F 25% (14,083 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Los Alamitos dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Los Alamitos websites are omitted.

100%

FAQPage structured data not detected

40 of 40 evaluated Los Alamitos websites — vs 95.48% across California.

98%

AggregateRating structured data not detected

39 of 40 evaluated Los Alamitos websites — vs 91.37% across California.

98%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

39 of 40 evaluated Los Alamitos websites — vs 94.84% across California.

Los Alamitos check rates compared with California rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckLos Alamitos rateCalifornia rateDifference
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals90.00%36 of 40 evaluated65.94%9,286 of 14,083 evaluated+24.06 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals32.50%13 of 40 evaluated40.57%5,714 of 14,083 evaluated−8.07 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals50.00%20 of 40 evaluated43.24%6,089 of 14,083 evaluated+6.76 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data97.50%39 of 40 evaluated91.37%12,868 of 14,083 evaluated+6.13 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals30.00%12 of 40 evaluated35.84%5,047 of 14,083 evaluated−5.84 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data100.00%40 of 40 evaluated95.48%13,447 of 14,083 evaluated+4.52 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals45.00%18 of 40 evaluated41.15%5,795 of 14,083 evaluated+3.85 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data70.00%28 of 40 evaluated73.26%10,317 of 14,083 evaluated−3.26 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey67.50%27 of 40 evaluated70.45%9,922 of 14,083 evaluated−2.95 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data97.50%39 of 40 evaluated94.84%13,356 of 14,083 evaluated+2.66 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey55.00%22 of 40 evaluated52.37%7,375 of 14,083 evaluated+2.63 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey70.00%28 of 40 evaluated67.39%9,491 of 14,083 evaluated+2.61 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey67.50%27 of 40 evaluated70.00%9,858 of 14,083 evaluated−2.50 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey65.00%26 of 40 evaluated63.40%8,929 of 14,083 evaluated+1.60 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals57.50%23 of 40 evaluated58.82%8,284 of 14,083 evaluated−1.32 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey52.50%21 of 40 evaluated51.49%7,252 of 14,083 evaluated+1.01 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data50.00%20 of 40 evaluated50.26%7,078 of 14,083 evaluated−0.26 pp

2026 US study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 50,405-website 2026 US study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected38.72%

Insurance or payment page not detected51.40%

Clear booking action not detected42.35%

Missing meta descriptions33.36%

Emergency-services page not detected58.40%

FAQ page not detected65.47%

Unclear H1 structure53.80%

Missing canonical tags26.14%

Limited useful content32.11%

Contact or inquiry form not detected68.70%

FAQPage structured data not detected95.57%

Images missing alternative text74.25%

XML sitemap not detected24.75%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected63.60%

AggregateRating structured data not detected91.06%

Service or treatment structured data not detected91.90%

Privacy-policy link not detected42.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Los Alamitos

How good are dental practice websites in Los Alamitos?
Across 40 audited Los Alamitos dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 73 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 79 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Los Alamitos dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Los Alamitos dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (100% of evaluated sites); “AggregateRating structured data not detected” (98% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (98% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Los Alamitos compare with the rest of California?
Los Alamitos's median score of 73 is equal to the California-wide median of 73, based on 14,083 audited websites across California.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Los Alamitos in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the California benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Los Alamitos figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.