Skip to main content
Alberta benchmark

Dental SEO & Website Benchmarks: Strathcona County, AB

Live figures from 30 indexable audited Strathcona County dental practice websites, recomputed as practices are re-audited. Most recent audit September 6, 2026. Methodology dps-37-v1.

71.50

median score

−3.50 vs Alberta median 75

70

average score

Alberta average: 72.30

78

top quartile

the score the best 25% of local websites clear

30

websites audited

of 1,664 across Alberta

Score distribution

Grade distribution in Strathcona County

Counts use all 30 indexable audited Strathcona County websites.

A

0.00%

0 of 30

B

23.33%

7 of 30

C

40.00%

12 of 30

D

23.33%

7 of 30

F

13.33%

4 of 30

Alberta distribution: A 8% · B 31% · C 28% · D 15% · F 19% (1,664 websites).

Largest local difference first

Where Strathcona County dental websites fall short

“Not detected” means a signal was absent from the homepage and up to two linked pages in a bounded crawl; it does not prove the signal is absent everywhere on the site. Every percentage shows its own evaluated base; checks evaluated on fewer than 30 Strathcona County websites are omitted.

97%

FAQPage structured data not detected

29 of 30 evaluated Strathcona County websites — vs 90.81% across Alberta.

97%

Service or treatment structured data not detected

29 of 30 evaluated Strathcona County websites — vs 92.07% across Alberta.

93%

Images missing alternative text

28 of 30 evaluated Strathcona County websites — vs 69.17% across Alberta.

Strathcona County check rates compared with Alberta rates, sorted by largest absolute difference
CheckStrathcona County rateAlberta rateDifference
Images missing alternative textWebsite fundamentals93.33%28 of 30 evaluated69.17%1,151 of 1,664 evaluated+24.16 pp
Missing meta descriptionsWebsite fundamentals23.33%7 of 30 evaluated42.43%706 of 1,664 evaluated−19.10 pp
Missing canonical tagsWebsite fundamentals13.33%4 of 30 evaluated31.13%518 of 1,664 evaluated−17.80 pp
Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detectedStructured data53.33%16 of 30 evaluated40.93%681 of 1,664 evaluated+12.40 pp
XML sitemap not detectedWebsite fundamentals16.67%5 of 30 evaluated27.28%454 of 1,664 evaluated−10.61 pp
Clear booking action not detectedPatient journey33.33%10 of 30 evaluated42.73%711 of 1,664 evaluated−9.40 pp
Insurance or payment page not detectedPatient journey76.67%23 of 30 evaluated67.43%1,122 of 1,664 evaluated+9.24 pp
Unclear H1 structureWebsite fundamentals63.33%19 of 30 evaluated56.13%934 of 1,664 evaluated+7.20 pp
FAQPage structured data not detectedStructured data96.67%29 of 30 evaluated90.81%1,511 of 1,664 evaluated+5.86 pp
Limited useful contentWebsite fundamentals33.33%10 of 30 evaluated38.76%645 of 1,664 evaluated−5.43 pp
AggregateRating structured data not detectedStructured data93.33%28 of 30 evaluated88.10%1,466 of 1,664 evaluated+5.23 pp
Contact or inquiry form not detectedPatient journey53.33%16 of 30 evaluated58.17%968 of 1,664 evaluated−4.84 pp
Service or treatment structured data not detectedStructured data96.67%29 of 30 evaluated92.07%1,532 of 1,664 evaluated+4.60 pp
FAQ page not detectedPatient journey70.00%21 of 30 evaluated68.33%1,137 of 1,664 evaluated+1.67 pp
Emergency-services page not detectedPatient journey53.33%16 of 30 evaluated54.69%910 of 1,664 evaluated−1.36 pp
Privacy-policy link not detectedPatient journey56.67%17 of 30 evaluated56.85%946 of 1,664 evaluated−0.18 pp
BreadcrumbList structured data not detectedStructured data70.00%21 of 30 evaluated69.89%1,163 of 1,664 evaluated+0.11 pp

2026 Canada study baseline

The frozen national picture for the same checks

Rates from the 11,797-website 2026 Canada study cohort — a frozen study base that counts every audited domain, so it is a different denominator than the live evaluated figures above and the two must not be read as one series.

Emergency-services page not detected69.35%

Clear booking action not detected56.82%

Insurance or payment page not detected78.50%

Privacy-policy link not detected67.52%

Dentist or LocalBusiness structured data not detected50.03%

AggregateRating structured data not detected94.43%

FAQ page not detected73.93%

Limited useful content43.84%

XML sitemap not detected31.14%

Missing canonical tags35.19%

Missing meta descriptions46.44%

Unclear H1 structure59.50%

Contact or inquiry form not detected62.02%

FAQPage structured data not detected93.76%

Service or treatment structured data not detected93.63%

BreadcrumbList structured data not detected71.15%

Images missing alternative text69.09%

Common questions

Dental SEO and website questions for Strathcona County

How good are dental practice websites in Strathcona County?
Across 30 audited Strathcona County dental practice websites, the median DentalPresence Score is 71.50 out of 100, and the best 25% of local sites score 78 or higher. The score summarizes 37 deterministic website and SEO checks covering structured data, website fundamentals, and the patient journey.
What do Strathcona County dental websites most often get wrong?
The most common gaps detected on audited Strathcona County dental websites are: “FAQPage structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “Service or treatment structured data not detected” (97% of evaluated sites); “Images missing alternative text” (93% of evaluated sites). “Not detected” is a bounded-crawl observation, not proof a signal is absent everywhere on a site.
How does dental website quality in Strathcona County compare with the rest of Alberta?
Strathcona County's median score of 71.50 is 3.5 points below the Alberta-wide median of 75, based on 1,664 audited websites across Alberta.
How can I check my own dental practice website's SEO?
Run a free DentalPresence score: it audits a practice website against the same 37 checks behind every figure on this page and returns a prioritized list of what to fix first. No card is required.

Methodology and limitations

How these live figures are computed

Live cohort. Figures cover the indexable audited practice websites currently published for Strathcona County in the DentalPresence index and recompute as sites are re-audited, so they will drift from the frozen 2026 study numbers over time. Each check's percentage uses only the websites where that check was actually evaluated, shown as its base.

Scoring. Methodology dps-37-v1: a bounded HTTP crawl of robots.txt, sitemap signals, the homepage, and up to two linked internal pages, scored across 37 deterministic checks. “Not detected” is a limited observation, not proof of absence.

What is excluded. Crawl-accessibility findings (DNS failures, blocked crawls, timeouts) come from the frozen study run and use a different cohort base, so they are not restated here — see the Alberta benchmark for them. Percentages are withheld wherever fewer than 30 websites form the base.

No clinical claims. Website signals only — not a clinical rating. These figures do not use rankings, traffic, conversions, credentials, or patient outcomes, and a failed check is not proof of lost revenue or poor care.

Use the benchmark

Score a dental website against the same framework

The Strathcona County figures describe a market, not an individual practice. Run a free score to inspect the public website signals detected for one practice — the same 37-check framework behind every number on this page.